top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 2 days ago (1 child)

My neighbor bought at $900,000. They eventually needed to move for work so they put the house up for sale at $1,500,000.00. A few months later to 1.3 million. Then weeks later $950,000. 4 days ago they switched it to for rent at $3,985 a month. Like dude, no matter what it's too much! 900k is too much and the rent is too much.

Is Abysmal on both ends. Plus now as a rental that house will be incurring damage. But that's how you end up owning two homes. You just can't sale the first one so you rent it out.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    I mean, your neighbor could 'man up' and just take a fucking loss.

    It would be better to get the 800k and invest it, then have it locked up in a home that's not appreciating or can't be rented.

    but hey, it's 2026, nobody can ever take a loss on property values... the line must always go up and we'll be stubborn idiots rather than take a minor loss...

    almost like people are emotional and stupid when it comes to money... instead of pragmatic and smart. But I'm sure your neighbor has convinced themselves they are super genius by not dropping the price to one that would actually sell...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (1 child)

    I've never been in that position. I wouldn't give up trying. But then I would have never put myself in that situation in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    The economists of it are clear. Every financial person would tell you sell the home, and invest the money.

    But people are not rational or smart, they are emotional. Psych studies tell us we percieve the loss for $10 as far more painful than the gain of $100. So if you gamble, and win $100, but then lose $20 afterwards, you will focus on the loss and often try to over compensate and make stupider bets, and then come out with -$200. Gambling is stupid like that, but people are addicted to it because of the emotional roller coaster it creates.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Truer Words have only been spoken by whoever wrote the book from which AI stole the idea that you just pasted here for me but that I have heard or read previously somewhere....

    • Amos Tversky: Known for his work on cognitive biases and the framing effect.

    • Daniel Kahneman: Known for his work on behavioral economics and the concept of loss aversion.

    • Richard Thaler: Known for his work on behavioral economics and the concept of nudges.

    • Herbert Simon: Known for his work on behavioral economics and the concept of bounded rationality.

    Oh man, that's interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    In the long run, yeah, it does save a lot of money to prepare your own meals and coffee, even now. But the people who yap like toast and coffee are the sole reason things are unaffordable truly suck and are completely detached from reality.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 32 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    How tf you don't have a house if you didn't get avocado toast?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 days ago* (1 child)

    I bet the lazy fucker likes to go on vacation with his kids from time to time. Imagine complaining not to be able to afford a house while basking at the beach every summer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    To be fair though, I'm living in a village and mostly cook for my family myself. I've been to Warsaw the other day and visited a small roardside store and a cafeteria.

    For the price of a sandwich I could make an entire meal. For the price of what I bought in a cafeteria (a croissant, a jar of jam, small pack of cookies) I could feed my 2+1 family for a few days.

    A small cup of coffee costs as much as a homemade dinner in itself either.

    I'm not saying you shouldn't eat out. I'm saying these parasites are milking us dry.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    the economics of all that are different depending on where you live.

    some cities eating out not very expensive compared to the time and cost of preparing food at home.

    other cities, it's wildly cheaper to eat at home than eat out.

    also depends on the food in question, the quality, and the market. Where I live $5 is a cup of coffee at the nice cafe, but there is no way that's buying you a proper meal for dinner at home either, that is closer to $10, but that same meal at a restaurant will run you $50+ And meal box services are VERY popular due to the fact their volume purchasing lowers the per meal cost to around the same as making your own food.

    further, some people just don't have the energy or time to grocery shop and cook every day, or don't think the opportunity cost is worth it. lots of folks who can't afford to eat out, economically speaking, still do because well they don't prioritize saving or budgeting.

    In 1960 the minimum wage was $1.00/hour and the price of the average US home was $11,000.00

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago (6 children)

    The government benefits here consider 200€ on groceries a month (<7€ a day) to be the absolute minimum they can give to ensure living in dignity. Now, I personally can take some cuts here and there (especially since they consider daily portions of meat essential) to save a few bucks, but even if you somehow get all your food out of dumpsters, you cannot save more than those 7€ from this.

    That's not nothing, a lot of people would (and do) consider cutting back on food to save for other stuff. But it would take 50 years to save for a house, if real estate didn't outpace inflation. Cutting back on food can help if you live well above your means, but if you are barely surviving, it won't make you rich any time soon, just gives you money to spend on things to replace the enjoyment of an easy full belly.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    You're right that cutting food costs is hard for someone already spending near the minimum, but the post is about the difference from eating lunch and drinking coffee prepared and possibly delivered by others. In some cities, that's probably about $20/workday, or $100/workweek, for about $5000/year. If we throw in dinner, the cost difference might be another $20/day, not limited to workdays.

    Being able to cook good meals at home is a life skill worth mastering, and pays off in both personal finances and in long term health and enjoyment. People should still want to be able to do this, regardless of financial status.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago*

    Most people don't want to audit themselves this way. It's too embarrassing and humiliating to realize how stupid you are with your money and that your struggles are entirely of your own making... better to just never look at blame other people for 'stealing' your money.

    And what's dumber is your bank probably has tools in your credit/debt card account that does this shit for you automatically.

    And the demo who whines the hardest about this is not the people who are legit poor, it's the upper middle class who think starbucks and sweet green is a daily necessity they can't live without, but yet somehow wonder why they can't seem to ever save enough for major purchases like cars and homes... and often they further use this 'despair' to justify further indulge in wasteful spending. Further, they tend to justify this absurdity by citing like luxury high end properties as the cost of a home, rather than properties that cost like 1/4 of those that they could easily buy, but they don't want to make the 'sacrifice' of having to not live in the most desirable/expensive areas of a HCOL area. Like, just because you can't afford a 2 million dollar apartment today, doesn't mean there aren't 500K ones 20-30minutes away from where you currently live that you could easily afford with a little fiscal discipline.

    Instead of... stop the wasteful spending, keep the savings, invest it, and all the sudden in a few years you have way more money than you did before and owning a home seems far more approachable.

    Also, talking back to people whining about their money problems... fastest way to end that relationship or friendship. Folks will just HATE you and call you an evil oppressive privileged person... rather than admit that maybe they have a spending problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 2 points 2 days ago*

    hey, I did that too!

    just give it five or so years. and tons of overtime. and a partner who works in tech who bought pre-covid and then sold at covid prices so you could buy a bigger house together also at covid prices. and then buy at the top of your budget because you keep getting outbid

    those home made meals and coffee were definitely the biggest factor!

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 days ago (9 children)

    In 1960 the minimum wage was $1.00/hour and the price of the average US home was $11,000.00

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›