top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 104 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • [–] 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Crazy! I didn't hear about that when it happened.

    "Hey we're being attacked, this you?"

    "Nope, not us."

    "Cool, cause we're about to fuck shit up."

    "Wait... no! Not like that!”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago

    I remember hearing about it when it happened and found it hilarious. Wagner mercs realizing that papa Putin doesn't care if they die (there was some audio clip circulating). Wagner mercenaries have been known to be pretty nasty (not unique to them of course, Americans have Blackwater and its successors).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 59 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Interestingly no country gave this correct responde. Or even took a passing interest.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 week ago (10 children)

    So....

    Is the US supposed to be the world police or not?

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Budapest memorandum entitles Ukraine to assistance in this case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago

    Considering that Russia attacked them, I think any entitlements in the memorandum are null in their eyes. The agreement is effectively nullified. From what I've briefly read, the document is not forcing any party to assist Ukraine, beyond advocating for them at the UN security council.

    I'd say the main difference here is that Ukraine probably wanted the "support" of the US. I think we did alright giving them access to money, weapons and training to defend themselves early on, and the major shortcoming was limiting the targets that they could strike with the weapons we sold. Turnabout is fair play, if Vlad wants to start throwing hands, he has to accept that he may get punched in the face.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    No it does not. Not even a little bit.

    The Budapest memorandum A) isn’t even a binding treaty. And B) only guarantees assurances from the US, UK, and Russia that they won’t invade Ukraine.

    There are absolutely ZERO provisions for the US giving military defense to Ukraine in the event they are invaded.

    The US and UK have upheld that. Neither have ever invaded Ukraine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Depends on the day and personal beliefs of the person advocating for it. So, Schroedinger’s World Police. As a USian, I would prefer the EU took over the world police job. It's not worth the effort.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    That is a very short-sighted view. The US' role as world police allowed it to station troops all over the world, projecting power and influence in every corner of the world. Every deal any country in the world made, always at least considered a US deal. The US was able to influence politics without actually having to flex the military muscle. They could always still do that if diplomacy didn't work. The projection of scientific and cultural power was also part of that influence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (13 children)

    Then it's simple. The US should help Ukraine. They're being invaded and are asking for help. For the "pragmatists", any nation what helps Ukraine with have an easier time doing business with them afterwards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    The US has.

    Ukraine has explicitly NOT asked for direct military assistance. They have not asked for troops or US airstrikes.

    They have asked for weapons, logistics, intelligence, and ammunition. All of which have been provided by the US and European NATO nations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    Ukrainians repeatedly asked to close the sky, which is de-facto a sort of direct help. Also talks about NATO troops being stationed on the West part. Still no balls.

    Second paragraph - only after 2022. Ukraine was denied even buying Western equipment in 2014. Obama is an asshole.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (12 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I mean you could replace the Stars and Stripes here with French Tricolour or Union Jack and I still think it works. The point is more that the lukewarm response to the Crimean invasion emboldened Russia into attacking mainland Ukraine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago*

    The trick is to have a US-controlled strategic interest there. See Syria, Russians attack a US-defended oilfield, Russia denies they are Russian regulars, US turn 200 of them into moist ash with artillery and JDAMs

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    We're not supposed to. But in the instance of Ukraine, we signed a treaty with Ukraine, Russia and ourselves that if Ukraine dismantled their nuclear weapons that the US would defend Ukraine if Russia invaded. And Russia would defend Ukraine if US invaded.

    but i guess international law is nonexistant and nobody gives a damn if a country makes a promise

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    I'd say go for it, even with Putin's threat of nukes.

    With how much Russia's oligarchy plundered their own war-chest over the years, to the point where they had to rely on Iran for weapons, I actually question if any of Russia's nukes actually work.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    Uh, maybe I'm unfamiliar with the engineering behind nukes. Do they expire? Or are you joking that they've just stripped the parts?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    Honestly mostly just the latter. Was joking that they would've maintained them so badly that none of the nukes would make it out of their silos, even if they were still capable of detonation.

    While I was aware the warheads require maintainance, @impairedimperator@lemmy.zip definitely said it better than I could.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I remember that time. Putin said that the Russian Army had not invaded Ukraine, not that there weren't Russian troops there. There were plenty of Russian military members who took a leave of absence to help restore democracy in Ukraine after the Euromaidan riots threatened the elected government into resigning. That was the official Russian position.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    They do have mineral reserves and if the US threw their weight into supporting Ukraine, their businesses would be very willing to work with the US. Even from a self benefiting, pragmatic perspective, the US should be supporting them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    That's why I'm so confused about the lukewarm support. From a purely capitalist lens, Ukraine could have been exploited to hell and back once Russia was BTFOd. But now they're looking at a decades long demining operation which is gonna hurt the exploitation effort bottom line billionaires pockets uhhhhh something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    We were pretty much onboard with helping Ukraine, and were providing intelligence and selling them arms.

    But Trump is totally a Russian asset, or was at the time. (Russia spent a lot of resources and manpower on Trump's 2016 campaign.) Nowadays, Trump might be catching on that Putin has absolutely no respect for him.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago

    And deny a symmetrical warfare environment to develop the next generation of drones? Never!

    Raytheon's index price wasn't even $70 in 2014!

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago
    [–] 6 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    Like the US will go to war with Russia, it's become a vassel state as of late.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    this is a reference to the Battle of Conoco Fields.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›