▲ 646 ▼ The correct response... (media.piefed.social) submitted 1 week ago by FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to c/noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works 95 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/noncredibledefense/p/1490862/the-correct-response
[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 child) It's because Ukraine doesn't have oil permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 child) They do have mineral reserves and if the US threw their weight into supporting Ukraine, their businesses would be very willing to work with the US. Even from a self benefiting, pragmatic perspective, the US should be supporting them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children) That's why I'm so confused about the lukewarm support. From a purely capitalist lens, Ukraine could have been exploited to hell and back once Russia was BTFOd. But now they're looking at a decades long demining operation which is gonna hurt the exploitation effort bottom line billionaires pockets uhhhhh something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago Well our capitalists are really really bad at capitalism, and are much more proficient at cronieism.....cronism?........cronyism? Oh ok it's the last one permalink fedilink source parent [–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago We were pretty much onboard with helping Ukraine, and were providing intelligence and selling them arms. But Trump is totally a Russian asset, or was at the time. (Russia spent a lot of resources and manpower on Trump's 2016 campaign.) Nowadays, Trump might be catching on that Putin has absolutely no respect for him. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 child) They do have mineral reserves and if the US threw their weight into supporting Ukraine, their businesses would be very willing to work with the US. Even from a self benefiting, pragmatic perspective, the US should be supporting them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children) That's why I'm so confused about the lukewarm support. From a purely capitalist lens, Ukraine could have been exploited to hell and back once Russia was BTFOd. But now they're looking at a decades long demining operation which is gonna hurt the exploitation effort bottom line billionaires pockets uhhhhh something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago Well our capitalists are really really bad at capitalism, and are much more proficient at cronieism.....cronism?........cronyism? Oh ok it's the last one permalink fedilink source parent [–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago We were pretty much onboard with helping Ukraine, and were providing intelligence and selling them arms. But Trump is totally a Russian asset, or was at the time. (Russia spent a lot of resources and manpower on Trump's 2016 campaign.) Nowadays, Trump might be catching on that Putin has absolutely no respect for him. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children) That's why I'm so confused about the lukewarm support. From a purely capitalist lens, Ukraine could have been exploited to hell and back once Russia was BTFOd. But now they're looking at a decades long demining operation which is gonna hurt the exploitation effort bottom line billionaires pockets uhhhhh something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago Well our capitalists are really really bad at capitalism, and are much more proficient at cronieism.....cronism?........cronyism? Oh ok it's the last one permalink fedilink source parent [–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago We were pretty much onboard with helping Ukraine, and were providing intelligence and selling them arms. But Trump is totally a Russian asset, or was at the time. (Russia spent a lot of resources and manpower on Trump's 2016 campaign.) Nowadays, Trump might be catching on that Putin has absolutely no respect for him. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago Well our capitalists are really really bad at capitalism, and are much more proficient at cronieism.....cronism?........cronyism? Oh ok it's the last one permalink fedilink source parent
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago We were pretty much onboard with helping Ukraine, and were providing intelligence and selling them arms. But Trump is totally a Russian asset, or was at the time. (Russia spent a lot of resources and manpower on Trump's 2016 campaign.) Nowadays, Trump might be catching on that Putin has absolutely no respect for him. permalink fedilink source parent