top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 1 hour ago

The future will talk in awe and condemnation about the scale of our beef consumption.

The amount of water it took to grow the feed they ate.

The amount of greenhouse gases it created.

The fact that the land use required was the size of north america.

The suffering that was required to inflict on the animals themselves.

They won't mention data centers at all.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    Stupid Question: Why is the heat not used to generate power through heat exchanging devices and turbines? Or at least for heating the water of nearby town by long distance heating? Wouldnt that be a pretty obvious synergy?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Two of the big reasons:

    1. The efficiency of power generation from heat increases with a larger temperature difference.

    2. Turbines operate via high pressure steam, not just hot water.

    So ya there's a lot of heat given off but it's not "high quality" heat because it isn't hot enough. And if you ran the data center hotter it would destroy the gpus.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 17 hours ago

    The likely irony that these data centres will be used in the pipeline of creating a commercial for bottled water.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 17 hours ago

    There was a time in the not distant past when "revolt or reform" was even a debate, but it is clear now what needs to be done.

  • source
  • [–] 122 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    grok is using delicious clean drinking water from the memphis sands aquifer for cooling. elon promised to build a water treatment plant in order to stop using drinking water but, and you’ll never believe this, he didn’t.

    fuck elon.

    please do not use grok.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    he did the same in germany. When questioned about the water usage of his tesla factory he gaslighted every1 by saying look here's water everywhere. Turns out, you can only extract so much water from the ecosystem and the inhabitants now have their water rationed. He doesnt give a flying fuck about other people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

    I know people LOOOOOOVE to use how many bajillion gallons (wtf is a gallon? is that a bucket? learn to use litres) AI data centers use, without looking into how much that is as a percentage of total water use:

    Basis: 322 billion US gallons per day, equivalent to 117.53 trillion gallons per year. Percentages are calculated against total US water withdrawals in 2015. (USGS)

    Category Annual volume, trillion US gallons Share of total US water withdrawals Source
    Total US water withdrawals 117.530 100.000% USGS, 2015 (USGS)
    Thermoelectric power 48.545 41.304% USGS: 133 billion gal/day (USGS)
    Irrigation 43.070 36.646% USGS: 118 billion gal/day (USGS)
    Public supply 14.235 12.112% USGS: 39.0 billion gal/day (USGS)
    Industrial, self-supplied 5.402 4.596% USGS: 14.8 billion gal/day (USGS)
    Aquaculture 2.756 2.345% USGS: 7.55 billion gal/day (USGS)
    Mining 1.460 1.242% USGS: 4.00 billion gal/day (USGS)
    Domestic, self-supplied 1.190 1.012% USGS: 3.26 billion gal/day (USGS)
    Livestock 0.730 0.621% USGS: 2.00 billion gal/day (USGS)
    All data centers: direct water consumption, 2023 0.0174 0.0148% LBNL: 66 billion liters (LBNL)
    All data centers: direct plus electricity-related consumption, 2023 0.2288 0.1947% LBNL: 66 billion liters direct plus nearly 800 billion liters indirect (LBNL)
    AI servers: annual scenario estimate, 2024–2030 0.193–0.297 0.164–0.253% Nature Sustainability: 731–1,125 million m³ per year (Nature Sustainability)

    The first eight categories add up to 99.879%. The small difference from 100% is caused by rounding in the USGS daily figures.

    The data-center and AI rows represent water-consumption footprints, while the USGS sector rows represent water withdrawals. They are included for scale comparison and should not be added to the sector totals.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 19 hours ago

    Thanks for sharing stats. If we could convert 5-10% more of total grid to renewable energy it would more than make up for additional data center water consumption growth nationally.

    We’re obviously in the Fuck AI community but at least there’s one path to limiting the external damages.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    We need to make evaporation cooling illegal. They can make a closed loop system like Nvidia uses but they won't, because it's more expensive. We need the law to force them to.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 15 hours ago* (1 child)

    What do you mean by "evaporation cooling"? A fraction of the water evaporates to provide cooling, a fraction is discharged as purge to prevent solute accumulation, and the rest is recycled? I thought the main reason that datacenters consume as much water as they do is when they don't recycle the water, and just use it once and then discharge it (no evaporation at all).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Reminds me of how Britain starved India cause it forced them to grow tea instead of food for themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 22 hours ago

    One report estimated that U.S. data centers consume 449 million gallons of water per day and 163.7 billion gallons annually (as of 2021).

    That estimate was from 2021.

    Now it's at least around 600 million gallons of water per day.

    Corporate capture of our government has destroyed our country, and will soon destroy our entire way of life. If we stop all harmful emissions today, the planet will still warm for another 20-30 years before it starts going back down. 30 more years of hotter summers, shortened winters, extended hurricane seasons, extended and worse droughts/wildfires...

    The people that approved these data centers should be charged with crimes against humanity.

  • source
  • [–] 70 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    There's nothing hard to explain for historians of the future: it was the second gilded age that saw the buildup of the techno-fascist infrastructure by greedy billionaires - sorry, trillionaires - in cahoots with the government. Now get back in line to get counted citizen...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I think it's pretty easy. We let the rich rule our world, and the rich demanded this, and so a lot of people just let it happen through bribes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 21 hours ago

    The drought statistic is true but the water consumption one is batshit insane lmao. It all comes form a press firm called Mordor Intelligence which hasn't meaningfully backed up that claim.

    AI datacenters are likely to not even breach 100 billion gallons BY 2028. (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/08/datacenter-ai-drought-water)

    Obviously that's still a lot of water, but 264 billion gallons right now is an absurd claim.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 18 hours ago

    False! Tge fruit videos are the side project! The real project is undressing minors and generating them doing CP! If you don't believe me, just ask grok!

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Per day? Per year? Per second?

    Sounds like a lot of water, but you can't just give an amount of water when you're talking about the rate of something.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 23 hours ago (1 child)

    Related Digital’s development of a $16 billion data center in Saline Township, Michigan is moving forward after they sued the local government in response to the locals voting AGAINST the construction. They’re just going to ignore the people’s vote 🫩

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 22 hours ago

    Same thing is happening in TN right now where a company is trying to build a small data center next to a zoo. The city held public hearings about it, but basically told people it was already a done deal. The company threatened to sue to city if it didn’t pass.

    These things are a blight on our society. It’s a race to the bottom with profits coming before everything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    The worst part is all that drinking water is being wasted semi-permanently. Most of it then goes to the sea and becomes saltwater. Even if the US heavily invested into desalination plants right now - it'd take decades to potentially retrieve most of that.

    All that for... another economic crisis?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 day ago

    Meanwhile we have commercials on the radio "debunking" the myth that data centers waste a ton of water. We're brainwashing the people, which is becoming easier as our braincells waste away using LLMs.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 day ago

    Future? Historians?

    You are funny.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago*

    No mystery. The entire point of capitalism is to please the disgustingly privileged at the expense of everybody else. Literally everything is like this. "AI" is just the latest version. See also cars.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago
    [–] 6 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    New rule: no water cooling in DCs. Air cooling and air con.

    That and some hard rules on power usage would go a long way. If the US ever updates its infrastructure, and especially for power, that should open up new, safe options that don't kill or poison people.

    For the mean time, though, let's stop the insanity.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    Not to mention the fact that AI companies aren't even profitable

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›