top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 143 points 1 week ago (9 children)

This has to have been edited by AI, where’s the cat’s tail?

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 1 week ago (1 child)
    [–] 52 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Yoga pants are push up bras for asses change my mind.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    I, at least, wear my compression capris (a subset of yoga pants, I think) for a medical reason (abdominal compression improves bloodflow more than compression socks, in POTS patients). They also make my butt look great, but I wouldn't squeeze into them every day if they didn't reduce my standing heart rate significantly.

    I'm not aware of a similar medical reason for wearing a pushup bra.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Yoga pants were first designed and sold by Lulu Lemon, which was founded by Dennis "Chip" Wilson.

    So I don't necessarily disagree, I hope you understand that you should be mad at other men for creating them, not at women for wearing them. Call it false advertising all you want, but its false advertising created by men.

    If you want a woman with an ass, just look for a hockey player, tbh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    Chip Wilson?

    That's the guy who said 'frankly some women’s bodies just actually don’t work for wearing Lululemon pants. It’s really about the rubbing through the thighs, how much pressure is there over a period of time, how much they use it,' right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

    Yeah? He's still responsible for them. I never said he was a good person or that he was wrong, just that men are responsible for this "false advertising" as you so eloquently put it.

    I'm not arguing with you that the pants make women's butts look better and that it may disappoint you when you manage to bed one. I am arguing that it's not advertising because women are humans and our society stopped explicitly selling those a while ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I don’t think anyone here is arguing against the fact that women are human.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    That's a very obtuse response. Idk why you'd ask people to change your mind when you don't want your mind changed, but I have a job to do that doesn't involve convincing you that advertising is not for human beings. Have fun with your thread.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago

    A fun way to confuse people: "Man look at the ass on that pussy!"

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago
    [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    Congratulations - you've entered the world of furries.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    It's food station looks a lot like my robot vacuum station

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›