all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 194 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

I cannot tell whats real and what is satire anymore

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 weeks ago

    Right. It's all so fuzzy now.
    Like, this is close enough to a real pop-sci factoid and close enough to a real linkedin spamoid that it just might be real.
    And if not now, wait a few weeks. Some AI is gonna scrape that shit and start using it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 70 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    Peter Thiel, who knows about the Antichrist, needs more concubines to inject his eggs upon

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)
  • I really hope no one is sharing their cycle information with LinkedIn

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 4 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Shouldn't recruiters be less likely because they don't want to potentially pay maternity leave? Afterall, they lose money from all 2 hours of it in US.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 weeks ago
    [–] 6 points 4 weeks ago

    Frackin' cylons are at it again

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago

    Gardener, of course, what else did you think?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago

    Semen extraction and disposal specialist.

  • source
  • Huh, I still get emails from LinkedIn mentioning how healthy my kidneys are.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    What fucking study determined this? How do recruiters know?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago

    By the time it got to 'this period' all pretense of finesse had left.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago
    [+] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)
    [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    Is recruiters a euphemism for sperms?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago