top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 45 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Some people are just more comfortable with good old familiar units like baby elephants per corgi. What do they even use for that in the metric system? Millihectares per decilitre or something? Whatever.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    “0.012 m^3^ meteor weighing 400 kg hit Texas”

    Boooooring.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    you could also say 12L meteor weighing 400kg .. which is pretty cool, imagine 12 cartons of milk weighing the same as 4 fairly large people

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    1.5 fairly large people. You're talking to Americans, remember.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I mean they were probably already confused by the L and the cartons of milk ..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Soda is generally sold in 2L bottles here, with single liter bottles growing in popularity. Alcohol is usually sold by the ml, though in units like "fifth" and "handle."

    Milk though, milk is sold in half-pints (not sure why they don't write cup), pints, quarts, half-gallon, or gallon. I like to pretend a quart is a shrinkflated liter though.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    What will we call a half ton? George Washington: 4 baby elephants.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    The most fucked unit of measurement I've seen is your mom.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Is nobody bothered about how un-corgi-sized the meteor on the picture is?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Americans will measure anything except use metric 😂

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Had to check that it's actually plausible.

    Assuming a corgi is 0.4m long, 0.3m tall and 0.2m wide and that a baby elephant weighs 120kg that gives the meteor a density of 20000kg/m³.

    There are only a few elements denser than that, but it's possible.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    The meteor was, according to NASA, about 2 feet across and weighed 1000 pounds. So their baby elephants are on the lighter side and their corgis are fairly normal size.

    I'm going to assume a sphere, 60 centimeters in diameter, and a weight of 450 kg. Volume of the sphere is 113000cm^3^, which gives us a density of 3,9g/cm^3^. That's heavier than most rocks (silicon at 2.3), but much lighter than iron (7.9).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Possibly, astrophysics is usually about order of magnitude and while iron is only 8000kg/m³ it's within error margins.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    And of course, it depends on how chubby the corgi is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    And how malnourished the baby elephants are. I mean, there are 4 of them, that's a big litter for an elephant. Perhaps they aren't all suckling as much as is normal because the mother elephant isn't producing enough milk for 4. Maybe the mother elephant is sickly, after such a difficult birth. God, what if she even died?! The poor things will starve!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Mixing units of measurement here; corgis are metric dogs.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I need a banana for scale.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    According to some searching a banana is 100 - 150 cubic centimeters, while this meteor was .012 cubic meters, meaning roughly the volume of 80 - 120 average bananas (mashed). The meteor weighed 400kg while an (again, perfectly average) banana weighs 100 - 130g. This means that the weight of the meteor is between 3076 - 4000 bananas. So let's call it the weight of 3500 bananas in the space of 100, or roughly 35x the density of your average earth banana. (Lemmy bananaticians or bananologists, please correct me if I did bad math.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Would be a great fit here

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You know well that Americans have only a very loose grip on units and reality. That's why they use imperial and "elephants per football field" like units.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    you have to adapt to the target audience.. look where that asteroid hit.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    The hate for the french is everywhere 😓😓😓

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    You mean you can fit 4 baby elephants inside a corgy? Damn...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 4 points 3 months ago
    [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    So that's, what, around 7 loaves of Wonder Bread weighing the same as one and a half gorillas?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Fahrenheit is still saner than Celsius for outside temperatures.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Tell me your from America without telling me your from America

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›