Sorry. I'm just very frustrated. You are right in concept, but nonetheless we've ended up with Trump. So is it really right? Should we have 'played the game' and pushed all out for the better candidate and ignored the deficiencies to do anything to convince enough people to vote against Trump? I don't know. But we're fucked now.

Ok. So things are working perfectly then with the upshot being Trump gots elected, and so we'll probably never get reasonably fair election again? And we've already destroyed our global alliances, started unnecessary wars, sent the economy to hell, put corruption off the charts ... and that's just perfect.

Why didn't all those non-voters bother to vote for Harris? You say it was because she didn't run a good campaign, that she had a bad platform. You criticized her 'bad' mistakes and spread the word on how bad she was. Don't you think that might have been a contributing factor as to why too many people thought she wasn't worth getting off their asses to vote?

It's the lack of consequences early on that's missing. If you give control to kids and they have no natural feedback that they can use to correct themselves, they're not going to do well. That means letting them fail stuff, get detentions, get bullying, etc. kids need to be left to fail and learn for themselves how to deal. Sure, parents need to offer support and encouragement and help out at certain times too.

Or Auschwitz?

You do you. But if the liberals are polling 45% in your riding, and so are the cons. Then are you really going to throw away your vote and let PP possibly win?

What's your other option then?

I'm all for minority governments and voting in greens or ndp etc., but often in a particular riding, there is only liberals or conservatives that have a chance. In that particular (common) case, if the original commenter would 'never vote liberal again' I just want to know if that's because they prefer to help PP's party become the government by not voting against their getting a seat, or if they just haven't thought that through. It's important to think through. It would be really bad to have a PP government.

Completely different. We're talking preference - not absolute like/dislike. I was responding to someone saying they'd never vote liberal again. I am not asking if they like PP, just if they'd prefer PP over a liberal. So if the choice is liberal or PP, it is a salient question whether they prefer PP over a liberal. If they'd prefer a liberal over PP when those are the only viable options, then not to vote liberal is confusing, at best. So it's a relevant question.

But everything is driven by profit. I don't think the 1% will be able to pivot to reduced profit for better stability/comfort.

So you'd prefer PP?

They could have been 130 yo. That's actually the best guess from piecing the timeline together. Not sure if they retired at some point - they were self employed and probably didn't set up 401k's