top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 349 points 5 months ago (15 children)

This is how you do it when you're serious about achieving what you promise for your constituents. Use your tools as needed, demand cooperation, when you don't get it, use your tools as leverage. Even if you fail, people see you did what you could and then they're ready to punish whoever stood in your way at the ballot box. This is why the oligarch class is so afraid of Mamdani who's just a mayor.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 107 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I'm a NYC resident, and I pay property taxes. If this is the stick that will (hopefully) get us the carrot of a wealth tax, I'm all for it. If property taxes end up going up, and we can use it to make the city better with the services Mamdani wants to get going, well then let's go. I will figure out how to pay the additional taxes somehow. With that said, let this be a bargaining chip. Working with the rest of NYC's political class is like a bunch of toddlers. The best thing you can do is give them two options, one you want (which they won't like) and one you don't want (which they really won't like). And make them pick. So they feel like they have agency, it's their decision, don'tchaknow?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 39 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    It’s a little bit misleading to refer to as any mayor of New York City as “just a mayor“.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    If NYC was a state it would be between the 11th and 12th most populous state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    And California is the world's 4th largest economy, behind only the entire rest of the United States, China, and Germany. New York State would be 8th.

    The Democratic states and cities are economic and sociopolitical leaders for a reason. Don't listen to the bullshit calling them socialist hellholes. The evidence suggests that taking care of your people (and maybe even having illegal immigrants too gasp or better yet legal immigrants) is actually an economically sound, and maybe even economically preferable strategy overall.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I love when people say the us should get rid of CA. Yeah let’s just throw away the worlds 4th largest economy because you’re anti woke 🙄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago

    You can also casually remind people that more Republicans live in California than Texas, which usually makes their head explode. It's an enormous state, with a huge economy, with tons and tons of people.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 171 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    "Threatens." Oh, they mean "proposes as an alternative."

    Fuckin' NYT.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 109 points 5 months ago* (12 children)

    Its so funny the NYT has like half a dozen quotes about people opposed to the tax hikes but not a single one has presented a real idea for alternatives.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 104 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Scale the property tax exponentially based on the valuation of the property. Make sure the wealthy land owners pay more. Much, much more.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 5 months ago (26 children)

    thats a good idea. A progressive property tax. I sorta can't believe it never occured to me and I never saw it mentioned previously. Would encourage affordable housing building I think to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    There'd likely be a lot of ways around it. Large plots would be broken up into smaller legal boundaries, parts would be owned by shell companies, parts would be loaned out and rented back at low rates, etc. etc. They'd find a way to take advantage of it to pay less than anyone else.

    A straight-up land tax with no frills does the job. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • load more comments (25 replies)
  • [–] 69 points 5 months ago (27 children)

    Better pass a rent freeze first or that property tax increase will just get passed on to the people who can afford it least.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • load more comments (26 replies)
    [–] 33 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    "We are either going to get the money from the fat cats or from you. Your choice.". I'm waiting on pins and needles to see where the money comes from.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 24 points 5 months ago (41 children)
    load more comments (41 replies)
    [–] 23 points 5 months ago

    Please tax the people taking us for a ride as much as possible

    They've had it too good for too long.

    It's not just the billionaires.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›