Think of how easily those things can be hosed down after they shred a whole flock of seagulls.
post
Poor geese...
Is it any worse than what would happen to birds with conventional turbofans?
Mmmm, geese...
My friends a goose and I asked him what he thought about this design. Completely unphased by it, infact I'm not even sure he understood me.
The amount of people in here that are complaining about non-issues as if they don't know that exposed props have existed for centuries now is baffling.
They're claiming 20% more fuel efficiency which would be huge, but at the expense of a metric fuck load of moving parts. Also who the fuck knows that happens if you have to make a gear up landing with these things
How many more moving parts than a conventional turbofan? Maybe four gears and a rotor?
This thing looks like it has less moving paths than a normal turbofan... Look at cutouts of the CFM56, easily available online.
Uh all of those blades, including the fixed ones, are variable pitch. Every single blade has several precision moving parts
Tarmac will definitely be closed for a while
Loud. There, an actual complaint that would be applicable to this design.
Regular turbofans will kill geese at basically the same rate as this and would be just about as dangerous as well. But moving parts outside of shielding will be louder, as more sound energy will make it to the fuselage.

all 28 comments