all 40 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 108 points 8 months ago (1 child)

They've got nothing on that hacker at 127.0.0.1 that fucker has all my files!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Probably intentional. There are enough stupid people in the World who would try funky things if those IPs where real.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Could have just used class E addresses, at least then it would look intentional insead of brainless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    There are several IP address ranges reserved specifically for documentation and examples such as 192.0.2.0/24 and 2001:db8::/32. That's what they should have used.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    I never raised any eyebrows at IPs like these in movies and on TV. It's just internet equivalent of fictitious phone numbers always containing 555.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah by using out-of-bounds numbers they avoid accidentally listing legitimate values who might get upset or free advertising

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    They could just use IPv6. Legitimately values or not no one is going to understand them, much less get upset by them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The attack was coming from ::1

    Or if that's too unbelievable, fe80:: has some scary implications while also not likely to ever be a real device.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    See? The ipv4 pool isn't exhausted yet. 3 quarters are still unassigned.:)

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    This is beginner level IT-TV mishap.

    Wanna see something truly ridiculous? How about two girls hackers one keyboard?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago

    Dark web super subnets. IPV10!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    What tv show/movie is this from?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 14 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    It’s from FUBAR. I think they took the show’s name as a general directive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Thank you, kind stranger! I put that one on my “to watch” list a while ago, but never got around to it. Guessing from your comment I possibly dodged a bullet?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Those IP addresses were about the most believable thing in that episode. It’s occasionally amusing nonsense, requires about 1% concentration, and if you fall asleep in one episode and wake up in the next, you won’t need to reach for the remote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I love those cyber UI mockups in TV shows.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    Not a single mouse, cursor or command line in sight, but somehow they always type 84 letters per second, and get a flashy UI with animation, 3D models spinning, moving, zooming and morphing, or at the very least windows popping up and doing various stuff.

    Just like in real life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 8 months ago