top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 242 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Funny, when Europe does this, it’s called “socialism”.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 137 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Can you imagine the screams of, “COMMUNISM!!!!” If Obama or Biden had done this. It’s all we would hear about for an entire election cycle. Fox “News” would play it nonstop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Didn't Obama do it for GM and a bunch of other companies as part of a bailout package for a period of time?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    So did Bush. It's only bad when their enemies do it. It's righteous and just when they do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    So if I'm reading that right they set for $700 billion worth of purchase during the Bush admin, it got reduced to 426.4 billion by 2014 and they claimed they made $15.3 billion. It sounds like they made a 3.5% gain on their investment total. A win! Yay... Only if you ignore the fact that if that money went in from 2009-2024, the money averages out on inflation to have been worth 481.29 billion. A loss of $12.15 billion dollars if they would have done anything else with it.

    Overall I wouldn't be mad that they wasted that money if they had focused on structuring the company moving forward in a manner that wouldn't end up supporting a wealth divide moving forward. The CEO "only" had a salary of $2.1 million in 2024. Which actually sounds mildly alright. Yet her take home was $29.5 million when they got done throwing stocks and bonuses at her. That's after GM stock started 2024 at $55.50.... and ended the year at $35.64.

    So the company lost ~36% of its "worth" and she got more than 13x her salary in stock and bonuses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 140 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    Seems like the government owning private industry might stray into the socialism thing thy hate. Why not do this with something more important like healthcare? Republicans are hypocrites.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Healthcare could help, that's good socialism. Intel is profits and power and control for the sake of it. That's bad socialism.

    That way when things fuck up they can point and go SEE SEE IT DOESNT WORK! WE TRIED IT AND IT MADE THINGS WORSE!!

    and if it somehow does manage to help or improve things they can now claim they did something smart and take all the credit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Well, no. In this case it's probably Intel is collapsing I assume, and they're the only CPU producer native to the US. It'd be a really bad thing strategically to let them fail, so they should be nationalized.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    Our healthcare system in the US is Socialism, only the government funds the corporations with subsidies, not paying outright for the citizens. It's a man in the middle system where they stick a middle finger up your ass to get money from you three times. With taxes, with insurance, and with actual medical care.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 94 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Uhhh, so much for the free market Republicans spent decades championing

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    They’ll run it into the ground regardless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 77 points 11 months ago* (4 children)

    Wow. Throw 16M people off health care, then invest the 'savings' in corporations. HEy, Intel, how do you like your blood money?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 47 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    government owning the means of production?

    🤔

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 46 points 11 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 38 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Fascism is a far-right, ultranationalist, and authoritarian political ideology that emerged in early 20th-century Europe, characterized by a totalitarian, one-party state, a charismatic leader, a fixation on national decline, and the suppression of individual rights and opposition groups. It combines elements of militarism, economic self-sufficiency, and mass mobilization, often through propaganda and violence, to achieve a vision of national purity and power.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

    This is why I don't like trump being called a nazi, a nazi was a nickname for the german fascist based on the name of the political party NSDAP, specifically the N part, National with the ti part being pronounced the same as the zi part in nazi.

    Trump is an american fascist. When you call him a nazi it paints the picture of the ultra villified almost over the top hollywood nazi and it muddies the water and lets other fascist media pundits dismiss it over exaggeration.

    Now after being pedantic I prefer these lists tlto check if you live in a fascist state

    https://www.keene.edu/academics/cchgs/resources/presentation-materials/characteristics-and-appeal-of-fascism/download/

    https://osbcontent.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/PC-00466.pdf

    Spoiler alert: the US is under control of a fascist government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

    Yes but contrary to China, USA doesn't use government subsidies to promote their own industries, or state owned companies to spy on the rest of the world. 🤪
    /S

    I hope Intel survives because a Chinese (mainland+Taiwan) monopoly will not be good, but I am so sick of American disinformation regarding China. Always blaming China for things USA has been guilty of for decades before China.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Are you sure about that? US hardware is spying on the rest of the world for decades. Cisco is in no way better then huawei.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Well, now that they're doing it like China is, the rest of the world should use tariffs to mitigate this, like we do with Chinese EVs for an example (since those are so heavily subsidized to root out competition not just in China, but worldwide)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    So uh, Intel doesn’t get anything, and gives up 10% of their stock because they’ve just decided to retroactively alter the CHIPs act?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    No, not at all. The government bought shares in Intel. When you have shares in a company you own part of the company.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Just to clarify and add to what you said, equity shares are not stocks. The gov gets dividends and such, but it isn't stock that is bought and sold on wall street. It's all about profitability and not about speculation. If the company makes money, so does the gov. If it loses money, the gov loses money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 11 months ago

    small penis government 😤

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago

    AyyyyyyyyMD

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    If tax payers are going to be investing into these businesses and they're avoiding taxes taking a share of the company is better than nothing.

    I mean, it's socialism, but don't tell their voters

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 11 months ago

    Release the Trump/Epstein files

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Everyone calling this socialism is a moron

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 15 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Boycot Intel? Okay, you got it!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Didn't the US do a similar thing to save our auto industry? Buying in? I'm hazy on the details, been a minute, but didn't we cash out and profit?

    Not saying this is the end game here, but still?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    Wasn't government cross-pollinating with industry a relevant component in 20th century definitions of fascism?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    While I don't trust this administration in the slightest this isn't unprecidented:

    • In 2009 he U.S. government took an initial 9.85% ownership stake in Chrysler as part of the company's bankruptcy restructuring. The government later sold its stake to the Italian automaker Fiat in 2011, exiting its investment completely.

    • As part of the auto industry bailout in 2008 and 2009, the government received a 60.8% equity stake in GM. The government sold its final shares in 2013.

    • American International Group (AIG): In its bailout, the U.S. government provided roughly $182 billion in aid and at one point held an almost 80% stake in the insurer. The government sold its last shares in 2012, ultimately making a profit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    I personally don't think any of these big companies should be privately owned. Rare win for the pedo admin. Maybe we can get 10% of the epstein files next.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    Next healthcare?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    Imagine bribing politicians to get tax breaks as those same politicians start to take more of a cut than the other side would have taxed you. I'm starting to think everyone that is rich and powerful are also incredibly stupid.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    us taking a stake in a failing company sums up america

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›