Stumbled across this screenshot. Now, instead of judging people for yourself, the computer can do it for you!!! This will in no way be used negatively by Reddit nor people who are arguing with each other. Original post is here, if anyone still has Reddit maybe go spread the good word of Lemmy and Piefed to these users :P

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 110 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Sounds an awful lot like the social credit score China was working on a few years back. Wouldn't be surprised if mods start preemptively banning users based on their AI summaries.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    The "social credit score" in China was blown out of proportion too. It probably changed since I last looked into it. But when that shit was all over American media it was literally the equivalent of a background check or credit score in the US. Work history, loan and credit history, etc.

    Like, it's funny how we can have essentially the same exact thing but only critize China's version of it. Make it scary by adding "social" to the name. People ate that shit up.

    Edit: to be clear I think both should be critized. Especially related to criminal history bias on race. But we spend more time talking about the Chinese version that doesn't actually effect anyone's lives in the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 45 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    i'll tip $5 to the first person who makes the ai say a slur

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    If I get it to call itself a clanker does that count?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 43 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    This clearly shows that such implementation of AI is a solution that still seeks for the problem. Such summary doesn't add anything helpful. On top of this, since AI is known to hallucinate, one has to check the comments for themselves, making a summary obsolete.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 36 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I am thankful for the fediverse and hope this never finds its way over here.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Unfortunately, you know it will. If it can be done, someone will do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago

    Sure, but one instance making something stupid doesn't mean all or most will. The decentralizing part has its advantages and disadvantages. Not being owned by a single corporation with stock holders is definitely the main advantage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Honestly the fediverse is already a bit of a privacy nightmare, and people refuse to take it seriously. Our version of this horror will include your comments and voting activity and likely a bunch of other telemetry which isn't public on reddit. Oh and it won't just be a single "official" AI agent, it will be dozens of them from every corporate or government which wants to build a user database and keep it around forever.

    We could bake real privacy protection into our fediverse apps, but the admins and devs seem to have completely punted on this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 33 points 11 months ago

    Fuck Reddit and Fuck Spez.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    What they're talking about here is a blueprint for stamping out individuality.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    Omg, you are such a Monica.

    Human personalities can be clustered into which member of the cast of Friends they most resemble.

    Fortunately, Friends is so brilliantly written that they managed to capture the entire spectrum of human diversity.

    (this is snark. I am totally a Chandler.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 27 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Can we get some more titties on Lemmy so I have zero reasons to go to that crappy site?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 11 months ago

    This person has strong opinions about the population of people currently victim to a live streamed genocide their tax dollars are funding.

    Well, fuck, I would sure hope so.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago
    [–] 18 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    did you guys not use reddit detective back in the day?

    also..

    you get what you get in that shit show anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I did, but the key difference is that it didn’t make an evaluation for you. It just gave you a collection of facts with some hard-coded things to look out for.

    The new thing is way worse. It’s just skipping the facts part entirely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Fuck reddit. Corporations ruined it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    This really makes me think the Amish were right after all with regards to modern tech.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Hahaha holy shit, Reddit's become worse than I thought. AI being added to something is how you know it's truly turned to shite.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    nothing shows up for profiles viewed on old.reddit.com.

    huzzah!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Reddit won't ban the shitheads but they will summarize their post history so you can better determine who the shitheads are! ....thanks?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago

    Lol that is some dystopian shit right there.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 9 points 11 months ago

    Ooo found a scary Reddit poster who might upset me. Thank Odin AI is here to save me like this /s

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    I wonder what it would do on my empty reddit account that I cleared all the comments on before coming here

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I'm curious how stuff like this works. Surely, many people's post histories can't fit into context. So, maybe the LLM keeps some sort of "blackboard" of summaries of posts, and edits it as it goes along? Would be pretty computationally expensive. I suppose another way would be to create embeddings of each post, and do some sort of clustering or something.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago* (6 children)

    The same way that you can look at someone's post history, skim it, and more or less understand what their deal is.

    Most users on reddit don't have this diverse set of interests or posts. Most of them post on the same subs and repeat the same types of posts... ad nauseam. Most people, online, aren't much more sophisticated in their language use or POV or anything... than a bot.

    Sure, 10 years ago you'd look at someone's post history and it would be all over the place, and they'd be writing detailed and nuaced paragraphics in lots of detail... but that's not what reddit is like anymore, or most of the internet really. God I remember when libertarians actually had decent theoretical argumentation to defend their viewpoints... and now it's just memes and cliche phrases repeated over and over.

    Pretty easy for any LLM to parse a person who just incessantly posts about the same stuff over and over. And if it came across someone doing long-form explanatory stuff... it would just ignore that data since that doesn't fit the task LLM is designed to process.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Amazon uses something similar to summarize product reviews, and it seems fine... But who knows how accurate it is.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›