Tensions between India and Pakistan have escalated further after a top Pakistani official claimed early Wednesday to have “credible intelligence” that New Delhi will carry out a military action against Islamabad within the next two days.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 91 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Before we all die in WW3 I'd just like to say: It's "Oh for fuck's sake."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 80 points 1 year ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I suspect that’s exactly the reaction Pakistan is hoping for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    On one hand I think you're right but on the other, if they're correct, I'd say they want India to know they're in their systems or have spies.

    That kind of an opsec failure is going to be disconcerting at a minimum.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Well, if Pakistan got it right this might just be disconcerting enough for India to abort this planned attack . Even if Pakistan didn’t get it right or are maybe even bluffing it might create an international reaction that could cause India pause before any future attacks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 78 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Stop reading the news.

    If it happens it happens. If you see the flash, lay down prone on the ground with your head towards it and your hands covering your face. Otherwise until that happens, just carry on as normal with your life

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If this causes nukes to fly, then it’s been nice knowing you all of if it causes WW3.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Same but also more real for me because I live in Mumbai. Probably the top target for Pakistani nukes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    They've had an actual (small) war before over Kashmir, subsequent to them both getting nuclear weapons.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kargil_War

    They did not use their nuclear weapons.

    It also marks one of only two instances of conventional warfare between nuclear-armed states (alongside the Sino-Soviet border conflict).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The Intel:

    👊🇮🇳🔥

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    ITT people claiming this could be a WW3 starter. Even if India engaged Pakistan militarily, I fail to see how that would lead to anything larger than a localised conflict.

    Like, neither country is geopolitically significant enough for any major players to care at that level. Sure, India getting bogged down in war could affect supply chains around the world, but would any of the heavyweights like US, China, Russia or a semi-relevant NATO country think that would be worth their involvement? If Russia being on year 11 of their military invasion of a NATO-bordering country hasn't sparked a world war yet, I don't see how this would either.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Since when is India not a major player? Last I checked they were the world's 4th biggest economy, have almost 20% of the population of the planet (more than four USes combined), 4th largest military spend and have nearly 200 nukes.

    Not to say that it would be part of a world war but it sounds weird to say that they're not a heavyweight but Russia is, despite having double Russia's economic output.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Agree with everything you've said. They only thing is China has been contesting a North Eastern border with India for some time so they might take the opportunity for some shenanigans.

    Still don't see it escalating beyond regional though as you said.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The British did a 'divide and rule'. Religion was the tool used to do the division 75 years ago at the time of separation. Religion is the same tool used today to divide the country internally and manufacture hate and consent for war.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The "everything is fault of the British" is such a cop out. India and the region had no trouble dividing themselves very publicly with caste systems, no?

    People just need education.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    The British popularized the phrase, which gives away the playbook. The rich and powerful use this playbook time and again to divide the masses. Education should help, but siloed propaganda is really effective to counter even education because propaganda uses fear & hate to bring out the animal in you, and when you're angry and scared you forget all reason and all education.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Border disputes (mainly Kashmir) worsened by the friction between a Muslim-majority Pakistan and a Hindu-majority India when both are led by increasingly nationalist governments, basically.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Ah yes, “my god(s) that I made up is better than your god(s) that you made up”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Hate to break it to you buddy, but the more you study religion, the more you'll realize that they're fighting to bring their gods to life and shape the world as they see fit.

    That's how they could convince people to go to war over their religion. There would be no need for war if one side believed in the 'right' god, because all the other sides would be punished by that god. But the religious interpretation of 'god' means that the outcome of the war will determine which god is 'right.'

    Gods being as real as we make them is a feature, not a bug.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Not how I wanted to solve global warming.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Please tell me they got it off Signal. So hot right now!

  • source
  • [+] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Isn't this just India posturing because of the Kashmir attack? The first threat about cutting off water was an empty one so now they are floating some military strike just to appear thst they care? I may eat my words here, but neither party is going to risk a full on war with an enemy with nukes over a place like Kashmir.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They really were just waiting for an excuse to start a war werent they?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›