top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 192 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Tracking. The links themselves will likely have unique referrer IDs so the platform knows where a click comes from.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 141 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Also, they track website visitors without them even clicking the button. Just loading the "share" icon from the social media website allows them to see that you are reading that specific article, and if they recognise your IP or can fingerprint your browser then they can tie it to your social media account (advertising profile).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Just loading the "share" icon from the social media website allows them to see that you are reading that specific article

    The buttons aren't necessary for this though. They can do that with a tag, or a hidden 1x1 pixel

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    That's not really a thing anymore since the GDPR went into force. These days, websites integrate these buttons directly into the webpage rather than loading them dynamically. The buttons in the screenshot are custom designs, too, so they didn't get loaded from the social media companies.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago

    Aren't these buttons still around just to track you even if you don't interact with them? Since most people don't logout from their social media on their personal device.

  • source
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Users don't need to interact with them, when a site adds the button to their page it allows that code to track you around the net. It's still generating revenue even if you never click on it.

    Sites still add them because it makes them money at the expense of your privacy.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • Sites still add them because it makes them money at the expense of your privacy.

    You can also consider it a form of advertising for the platforms. The buttons not only suggest for the user that they should use an indicated platform, but give them an immediate way to engage with it as well. It's manipulation, all the way down.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 58 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I still want to know why they show up on porn sites...

    Cause I'm sitting here watching backdoor sluts 9 and thinking to myself; "you know who'd really enjoy this? Grandma."

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I also recently had a porn site ask me, if I'd like to login with a Google account. Absolutely fuck that Google login dialog on any webpage that has it, but why in the world would anyone log into a porn site with it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 54 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You'd be surprised how the average person interacts with the Internet .

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Share button > copy link > paste unedited url to SMS

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago

    In uBlock Origin activate the filterlist EasyList – Social Widgets to remove those.

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I love how pornhub has a share button.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago*

    I always wonder how many people accidentally shared it to facebook or something. I know the vast majority of people keep all of their social media auto-logged and and linked to each other and shit. And they're using Chrome.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Quite a few people use them on the more modern sites like bluesky/mastodon (also rss/email etc...).

    Its like less than 99% of people from what I see on my sites (Im a software developer) but its enough to make a difference.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    As far as I can tell they are easy to add and everyone else is doing it, so the people who make decisions about the website don't want to feel left out. Kind of like how those sites became popular in the first place, easy and perceived popularity.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    I don't. Fuck each and everyone of those spy balls.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Share buttons are fucking useless IMO. You have to jump through a dozen screens to actually share them, or just copy the link and paste it where you want shared.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    They aren't useless at all, just not in the sense you expect. Those icons are hosted on the respective website and therefore serve as a giant tracking pixel. Better block them altogether.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Well I sure as hell don't use that one.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I use the share by email button all the time because it is 2 clicks easier than copying and pasting the url.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I don't think I've ever noticed those lol.

    Who needs adblock when you're just oblivious

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    yes. I see their utm's all the time

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    Look at all those methods I would never use to share anything from a website.

    Might just be me, but if I wanted to share something with someone it's going to be an IM

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Alright, I'll admit it, I don't get it. What are the icons supposed to say?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Those are still a thing? I adblocked them a long time ago.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›