you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 119 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

It's to protect from falling debris from the ceiling. How much it helps is debatable but it's best they have there in school. More effective on traditional bombing than nukes

In Finland we have bomb shelters everywhere, it's arguably more effective

Edit: I'm too drunk to write coherent sentences

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's also to give people something to do. Something to practice and focus on getting right. Gives hope and keeps people from getting caught in a panic loop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    In WW1 armies learned helmets were a good idea when artillery kicked up big chunks of debris killing unlucky soldiers when it rained down on them. Ballistic protection was an afterthought that came along later.

    So yeah better than nothing I guess, same with tornado drills our schools have sometimes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    They almost stopped using helmets again, too. The number of head injuries skyrocketed. Thankfully, someone pointed out to command that the helmets weren't causing the injuries, but converting fatalities into injuries. They hadn't been recording head injuries on corpses.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    It also helps against what tends to be modeled and seen as the largest cause of injury during a nuclear scale explosion like that seen in Beirut, namely shards of glass, though it definitely helps survive falling beams in timber framed buildings.

    Remember, thanks to the wonders of the inverse square law you are statistically far more likely to be in the area that gets light to moderate blast damage from the pressure wave rather than core of the blast.

  • source
  • parent