you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 114 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 67 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And in a similar but completely different way, the fish are being added to massive bodies of water. Home aquariums are minute in comparison, so they can't balance out chemical swings as easily and are much more prone to higher levels of nitrites and other toxic chemicals. The larger the body of water, the more stable the water quality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    So what I hear you saying is I need a bigger aquarium...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    something i love about Lemmy is that on the drop of a hat someone is willing to calculate the "surface area to fish ratio"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Problem is, you almost never know if that's actually true or complete bullshit.

    It seems plausible, but killing virgins for rain also seemed plausible back then in the 70s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The math actually works, and is quite simple. Just assume the fish is a sphere

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I'm confused though. Don't people use this to talk about how small things like bugs can fall from a large height and be uninjured, but large things like a human or elephant will be injured if falling from a height? I feel like what you're saying is backwards to what the internet has told me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments