▲ 988 ▼ Anon questions our energy sector (slrpnk.net) submitted 2 years ago by MataVatnik@lemmy.world to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 382 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Batbro@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Fukushima? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bouh@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Fukushima, in 2024,is a city of 272569 inhabitants. If that's unlivable, I'm fine with it. Hiroshima, Nagazaki and Chernobyl are all inhabited too. Saying that nuclear stuff makes places unlivable is plain wrong, it's anti-science. It's comics level of bullshit science. Travel in time is a more serious theory than nuclear stuff destroying the planet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bouh@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Fukushima, in 2024,is a city of 272569 inhabitants. If that's unlivable, I'm fine with it. Hiroshima, Nagazaki and Chernobyl are all inhabited too. Saying that nuclear stuff makes places unlivable is plain wrong, it's anti-science. It's comics level of bullshit science. Travel in time is a more serious theory than nuclear stuff destroying the planet. permalink fedilink source parent
