“This was not reckless driving. This was murder,” the judge said before she read out Mackenzie Shirilla's verdict Monday afternoon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 318 points 3 years ago (4 children)

The reason why they say this was murder:

Two weeks before the crash, she allegedly threatened to crash her vehicle when she was driving with Russo because she was upset over a disagreement they had. Russo called his mother and asked to be picked up, and a friend ended up retrieving him. In a phone call with Russo, the friend allegedly overheard Shirilla say, “I will crash this car right now,” prosecutors said in court documents.

This isn't a drunk driver, or a thrillseeker, this is someone with murderous intent.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Sounds more like a mental health issue tbh...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    I agree 100 percent this is a child with some kind of inability to understand the consequences of her actions she should be placed in a care facility until she demonstrates the ability to make proper decision making ability

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 3 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    In most US jurisdictions if you're "just" trying to commit a felony, like purposely crashing your car at 100+ MPH (160+ KPH) to cause grievous bodily harm to others, and someone dies as a result that's automatically elevated to murder.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago*

    It'll depend on the jurisdiction. But 'intent' for murder does not mean "pre-planned". Heat of the moment intention to do serious harm is enough for a murder conviction in the UK (and, I believe, the US).

    In this case, the prosecution accused her of pre-planning as well as intent, and the jury agreed with one or both arguments.

    Russo, the judge, delivered a scalding description of the case before she read out the verdict, saying Shirilla had a "mission" she executed with "precision" that fateful day — and "the mission was death."

    “The [crash] video clearly shows the purpose and intent of the defendant. She chose a course of death and destruction that day,” Russo said.

    “She morphs from a responsible driver to literal hell on wheels as she makes her way down the street,” Russo said, saying Shirilla made a calculated decision to drive that morning, when not many people would be around, on an obscure route she did not routinely take.

    Prosecutor Michael O’Malley told NBC affiliate WKYC of Cleveland that the crash video was damning, saying, “The intent was obvious upon seeing that video that there was only one goal.”

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 7 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I recently read that a 70mph accident is considered "unsurvivable." Regrettably I don't recall the source. Because people survive accidents that happen on 70mph speed limit highways all the time, I assume two things. 1. That the accident has to happen AT 70mph. And that 2, most people are able to slow down or perhaps the vehicle hits something first, glancing blow, that sort of thing, which brings the speed down, making it more survivable. So yeah, I think that makes 100mph suicide/murder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -32 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Sounds more like a suicide/self harm thing to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    When you include an unconsenting person in the attempt, it is also murder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Not a lawyer, but even if they consent isn't it murder?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    You can't consent to murder, the best you could do is indemnify someone/an organisation against accidental death.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    You can't consent to murder

    Genuine question - why not? If someone wants to be murdered, for whatever reason, would that not be them consenting?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago*

    There are cases of mutual murderer/suicide pacts where there's shared responsibility and actions taken by each party but that wouldn't have been possible when she was the only one in control of the car. Even if the boyfriend was suicidal, and there's no reason to think he was from this article, the other passenger clearly wasn't. IANAL either but I think that's what the above comment was trying to get at.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It sounds much more like an abusive relationship. She was trying to punish him, regardless of the risk to herself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -46 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    ...no, no, no... only WOMEN can be in abusive relationships.

    At least that is the utter bullshit you would believe if you listened to the feminist/white knight rhetoric out there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    This would have been better if you left it untyped.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -22 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Clearly you don't want to hear the truth of the general bias of the internet and society as a whole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 23 points 3 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)
  • [+] -30 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    This is why suicidal people are dangerous, it's a relatively small change from killing yourself, to killing others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    This is why pastry chefs are dangerous, it's a relatively small change from baking your bread, to baking others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    @ryathal @agressivelyPassive

    Have suicidal ideation is in no way, shape or form the same as being the perpetrator of a murder-suicide. Neither is being suicidal a lead-in to becoming a murderer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [+] -18 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    As such, it is clear that suicides tend to have high levels of aggressive–destructive impulsive behaviours, generally referred to as impulsive–aggressive behaviours. These have been operationally defined in suicide studies as a tendency to react with animosity or overt hostility without consideration to possible consequences, when piqued or under stress.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1277022/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago*

    Did you read anything else in that paper...? The words around that statement? Even the abstract?

    Or did you google what you wanted to see and post the result, because that paper is not about people harming others whilst attempting suicide. It is barely tangentially about that.

    (it's about the impact of aggressive-impulsive tendencies on the suicide...r themselves)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    No there may be a small chance of collateral damage, such as this case. But suicidal thinking does not make you think of killing others. You're clearly lucky enough to have never had suicidal ideation, but it never comes near the kind of thoughts that want to kill others

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It changes when it comes to acting. If you have the gun to your head, shooting someone telling you to stop is also highly likely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    Let's see some stats on that one because being an abusive murder is a lot different than suicidality.

    There is no correlation between her wanting to kill people and her potential suicidality. They just coincidentally line up in this case.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    I have a relative who was recently given a DUI.

    They went to the store, sober, and bought a handle of vodka (1.75 liters) consumed the vast majority, and drove around.

    He wanted to die in a head on collision. Selfish fuck.

    I don't have a problem with people having the freedom to decide enough is enough, but don't harm others in the process, at least more so than the death would cause. Especially innocent unrelated people.

  • source
  • parent