▲ 1061 ▼ What does a PhD mean? (mander.xyz) submitted 2 years ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 74 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Treevan@aussie.zone 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's funny but you see the same thing in sports, or I see it specifically in hockey. Phenom kid gets drafted and at 18 has the social skills of the hockey puck he's playing with. By the time he's 36 he's not the player he once was but is a more well rounded individual with age and experience. When you focus all your energy to become the best at something, like a PhD, athlete, musician, whatever, you sacrifice some things along the way for sure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] trolololol@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* When u look at most people I feel like the trending alternative at 18-50 y is personality of a hockey puck and also skills of a hockey puck, with the reasoning ability of the hockey puck. permalink fedilink source parent [–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago I feel so called out. I’m alright in my field but completely clueless outside of it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] angrystego@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago That's not universally true. I know several people with PhD who have encyclopedic knowledge completely outside their specialisation. Some people are just super intelligent, talented and have enormous memory. The world is not fair. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's funny but you see the same thing in sports, or I see it specifically in hockey. Phenom kid gets drafted and at 18 has the social skills of the hockey puck he's playing with. By the time he's 36 he's not the player he once was but is a more well rounded individual with age and experience. When you focus all your energy to become the best at something, like a PhD, athlete, musician, whatever, you sacrifice some things along the way for sure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] trolololol@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* When u look at most people I feel like the trending alternative at 18-50 y is personality of a hockey puck and also skills of a hockey puck, with the reasoning ability of the hockey puck. permalink fedilink source parent [–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago I feel so called out. I’m alright in my field but completely clueless outside of it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* When u look at most people I feel like the trending alternative at 18-50 y is personality of a hockey puck and also skills of a hockey puck, with the reasoning ability of the hockey puck. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago I feel so called out. I’m alright in my field but completely clueless outside of it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago That's not universally true. I know several people with PhD who have encyclopedic knowledge completely outside their specialisation. Some people are just super intelligent, talented and have enormous memory. The world is not fair. permalink fedilink source parent