▲ 2224 ▼ Redditor when women (i.imgur.com) submitted 2 years ago by nave@lemmy.zip to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 275 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] DunkelLicht@discuss.tchncs.de 80 points 2 years ago (10 children) I mean, the irony is that there are even less women on lemmy than on reddit so like... permalink fedilink source hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago (2 children) Im a woman so permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AquaTofana@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago (1 child) There are dozens of us! Dozens! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mark_dennis1199@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago Binders full of women! permalink fedilink source parent [–] braxy29@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (1 child) there's at least the two of us permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] StephniBefni@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) Make it three now permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children) Woman here, checking in permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* Not a girl checking in! permalink fedilink source parent [–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Count me in for the women-on-lemmy gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uglyfurniture@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Another one here for the count! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brekky@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Might as well add my voice to the gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago Is this a bandwagon I see here? Count me in permalink fedilink source parent [–] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago [citation needed] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 years ago more femboys, at least percentually, though worth it permalink fedilink source parent [–] FollyDolly@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago Checking in, am also women. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) in percentage or in total? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BarelyOriginal@feddit.nl 33 points 2 years ago Yes permalink fedilink source parent [–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago part-time woman here permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago Also women here, hi. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nima@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago oh yeah dude, totally. (I am a woman) permalink fedilink source parent [–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago There also the ones that one would think it's a woman, because of the username. permalink fedilink source parent [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -20 points 2 years ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nah. Lots of trans women and we care about their mental health. Just cope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Why don't you just say there are lots of women? Your comment is both transphobic and anti-feminist permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (2 children) cis women aren't as hurt by misgendering. not transphobic, just aware. not anti-feminist, they're advocating for gender neutral language. holster your shit lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago cis women aren't as hurt by misgendering Nice generalization. permalink fedilink source parent [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -10 points 2 years ago (3 children) That's implying trans women are less stable and easier to hurt because they are trans. That's transphobic. Assuming cis women don't get hurt by misgendering is sexist at best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Homie I work in mental health and recognizing a trigger is not a force of systemic oppression, it's a courtesy. Pretending everything is hunky dory and no one has differing needs or experiences is the "i dont see color" equivalent of gender. why would cis women even have that trigger?? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] braxy29@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) try talking to some ciswomen and find out if misgendering hurts. spoiler - it does. edit - fwiw, i keep hearing that lemmy is friendlier than reddit. this doesn't align with my experience so far, it's the same hateful shit as always. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago I'm not saying it doesnt, even in my original post I said they aren't "AS" hurt. Why not try giving a "sir" to 100 trans women and 100 cis women and see how the reactions differ? The way I understand it, you're saying there wont be any difference in reaction. That's naive. It's a trigger! Just like how I can get uncomfortable when someone talks about s.assault but it isn't a trigger for me. If I'm in a group session with people recovering from trauma, I'm going to be very careful talking about SA but if I'm with colleagues I might speak more directly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) You think you're so damn clever for appropriating the inclusive folks' argument and trying to throw it back at them, but you really aren't. We can all see you for the dishonest concern troll that you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I just find it unsettling that those comments only seems to care about the trans. Yeah, no shit: that's because cis people are cared about by default. Nobody needs you white-knighting for the already-advantaged. But we both know you already knew that. I'm continuing to not buy your dishonest concern-trolling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lowleveldata@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago ok? You're free to not buy what you don't want to permalink fedilink source parent [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not endorsing what PsychedSy is saying (esp in the replies), but I am calling you out for saying that being aware of differing needs of trans people is transphobic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. There is something uncomfortable about saying that trans women are on average more unstable. But I think that's more about the word choice "unstable" where I would frame it more neutrally like "different needs". I guess "unstable" sounds like it's their fault/failing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago Let me help. Trans women are (on average) less stable and easier to hurt. We done here? permalink fedilink source parent [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Nah. Ignoring blahaj won't help. Soz, bitch. permalink fedilink source parent [–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) This chick has a point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lowleveldata@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago Thanks bro permalink fedilink source parent [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago I'm actually really curious what you think you're doing with this shit. You can check but I don't downvote. What's your goal? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago (2 children) Im a woman so permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AquaTofana@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago (1 child) There are dozens of us! Dozens! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mark_dennis1199@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago Binders full of women! permalink fedilink source parent [–] braxy29@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (1 child) there's at least the two of us permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] StephniBefni@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) Make it three now permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children) Woman here, checking in permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* Not a girl checking in! permalink fedilink source parent [–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Count me in for the women-on-lemmy gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uglyfurniture@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Another one here for the count! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brekky@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Might as well add my voice to the gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago Is this a bandwagon I see here? Count me in permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AquaTofana@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago (1 child) There are dozens of us! Dozens! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mark_dennis1199@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago Binders full of women! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mark_dennis1199@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago Binders full of women! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] braxy29@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (1 child) there's at least the two of us permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] StephniBefni@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) Make it three now permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children) Woman here, checking in permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* Not a girl checking in! permalink fedilink source parent [–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Count me in for the women-on-lemmy gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uglyfurniture@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Another one here for the count! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brekky@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Might as well add my voice to the gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago Is this a bandwagon I see here? Count me in permalink fedilink source parent
[–] StephniBefni@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) Make it three now permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children) Woman here, checking in permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* Not a girl checking in! permalink fedilink source parent [–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Count me in for the women-on-lemmy gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uglyfurniture@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Another one here for the count! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brekky@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Might as well add my voice to the gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago Is this a bandwagon I see here? Count me in permalink fedilink source parent
[–] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children) Woman here, checking in permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* Not a girl checking in! permalink fedilink source parent [–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Count me in for the women-on-lemmy gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uglyfurniture@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Another one here for the count! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brekky@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Might as well add my voice to the gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago Is this a bandwagon I see here? Count me in permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* Not a girl checking in! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Count me in for the women-on-lemmy gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] uglyfurniture@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Another one here for the count! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brekky@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Might as well add my voice to the gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago Is this a bandwagon I see here? Count me in permalink fedilink source parent
[–] uglyfurniture@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Another one here for the count! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brekky@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Might as well add my voice to the gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago Is this a bandwagon I see here? Count me in permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Brekky@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Might as well add my voice to the gang permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago Is this a bandwagon I see here? Count me in permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago Is this a bandwagon I see here? Count me in permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 years ago more femboys, at least percentually, though worth it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FollyDolly@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago Checking in, am also women. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) in percentage or in total? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BarelyOriginal@feddit.nl 33 points 2 years ago Yes permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago part-time woman here permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago Also women here, hi. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nima@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago oh yeah dude, totally. (I am a woman) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago There also the ones that one would think it's a woman, because of the username. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -20 points 2 years ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nah. Lots of trans women and we care about their mental health. Just cope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Why don't you just say there are lots of women? Your comment is both transphobic and anti-feminist permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (2 children) cis women aren't as hurt by misgendering. not transphobic, just aware. not anti-feminist, they're advocating for gender neutral language. holster your shit lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago cis women aren't as hurt by misgendering Nice generalization. permalink fedilink source parent [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -10 points 2 years ago (3 children) That's implying trans women are less stable and easier to hurt because they are trans. That's transphobic. Assuming cis women don't get hurt by misgendering is sexist at best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Homie I work in mental health and recognizing a trigger is not a force of systemic oppression, it's a courtesy. Pretending everything is hunky dory and no one has differing needs or experiences is the "i dont see color" equivalent of gender. why would cis women even have that trigger?? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] braxy29@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) try talking to some ciswomen and find out if misgendering hurts. spoiler - it does. edit - fwiw, i keep hearing that lemmy is friendlier than reddit. this doesn't align with my experience so far, it's the same hateful shit as always. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago I'm not saying it doesnt, even in my original post I said they aren't "AS" hurt. Why not try giving a "sir" to 100 trans women and 100 cis women and see how the reactions differ? The way I understand it, you're saying there wont be any difference in reaction. That's naive. It's a trigger! Just like how I can get uncomfortable when someone talks about s.assault but it isn't a trigger for me. If I'm in a group session with people recovering from trauma, I'm going to be very careful talking about SA but if I'm with colleagues I might speak more directly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) You think you're so damn clever for appropriating the inclusive folks' argument and trying to throw it back at them, but you really aren't. We can all see you for the dishonest concern troll that you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I just find it unsettling that those comments only seems to care about the trans. Yeah, no shit: that's because cis people are cared about by default. Nobody needs you white-knighting for the already-advantaged. But we both know you already knew that. I'm continuing to not buy your dishonest concern-trolling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lowleveldata@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago ok? You're free to not buy what you don't want to permalink fedilink source parent [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not endorsing what PsychedSy is saying (esp in the replies), but I am calling you out for saying that being aware of differing needs of trans people is transphobic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. There is something uncomfortable about saying that trans women are on average more unstable. But I think that's more about the word choice "unstable" where I would frame it more neutrally like "different needs". I guess "unstable" sounds like it's their fault/failing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago Let me help. Trans women are (on average) less stable and easier to hurt. We done here? permalink fedilink source parent [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Nah. Ignoring blahaj won't help. Soz, bitch. permalink fedilink source parent [–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) This chick has a point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lowleveldata@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago Thanks bro permalink fedilink source parent [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago I'm actually really curious what you think you're doing with this shit. You can check but I don't downvote. What's your goal? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nah. Lots of trans women and we care about their mental health. Just cope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Why don't you just say there are lots of women? Your comment is both transphobic and anti-feminist permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (2 children) cis women aren't as hurt by misgendering. not transphobic, just aware. not anti-feminist, they're advocating for gender neutral language. holster your shit lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago cis women aren't as hurt by misgendering Nice generalization. permalink fedilink source parent [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -10 points 2 years ago (3 children) That's implying trans women are less stable and easier to hurt because they are trans. That's transphobic. Assuming cis women don't get hurt by misgendering is sexist at best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Homie I work in mental health and recognizing a trigger is not a force of systemic oppression, it's a courtesy. Pretending everything is hunky dory and no one has differing needs or experiences is the "i dont see color" equivalent of gender. why would cis women even have that trigger?? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] braxy29@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) try talking to some ciswomen and find out if misgendering hurts. spoiler - it does. edit - fwiw, i keep hearing that lemmy is friendlier than reddit. this doesn't align with my experience so far, it's the same hateful shit as always. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago I'm not saying it doesnt, even in my original post I said they aren't "AS" hurt. Why not try giving a "sir" to 100 trans women and 100 cis women and see how the reactions differ? The way I understand it, you're saying there wont be any difference in reaction. That's naive. It's a trigger! Just like how I can get uncomfortable when someone talks about s.assault but it isn't a trigger for me. If I'm in a group session with people recovering from trauma, I'm going to be very careful talking about SA but if I'm with colleagues I might speak more directly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) You think you're so damn clever for appropriating the inclusive folks' argument and trying to throw it back at them, but you really aren't. We can all see you for the dishonest concern troll that you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I just find it unsettling that those comments only seems to care about the trans. Yeah, no shit: that's because cis people are cared about by default. Nobody needs you white-knighting for the already-advantaged. But we both know you already knew that. I'm continuing to not buy your dishonest concern-trolling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lowleveldata@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago ok? You're free to not buy what you don't want to permalink fedilink source parent [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not endorsing what PsychedSy is saying (esp in the replies), but I am calling you out for saying that being aware of differing needs of trans people is transphobic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. There is something uncomfortable about saying that trans women are on average more unstable. But I think that's more about the word choice "unstable" where I would frame it more neutrally like "different needs". I guess "unstable" sounds like it's their fault/failing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago Let me help. Trans women are (on average) less stable and easier to hurt. We done here? permalink fedilink source parent [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Nah. Ignoring blahaj won't help. Soz, bitch. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Why don't you just say there are lots of women? Your comment is both transphobic and anti-feminist permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (2 children) cis women aren't as hurt by misgendering. not transphobic, just aware. not anti-feminist, they're advocating for gender neutral language. holster your shit lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago cis women aren't as hurt by misgendering Nice generalization. permalink fedilink source parent [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -10 points 2 years ago (3 children) That's implying trans women are less stable and easier to hurt because they are trans. That's transphobic. Assuming cis women don't get hurt by misgendering is sexist at best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Homie I work in mental health and recognizing a trigger is not a force of systemic oppression, it's a courtesy. Pretending everything is hunky dory and no one has differing needs or experiences is the "i dont see color" equivalent of gender. why would cis women even have that trigger?? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] braxy29@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) try talking to some ciswomen and find out if misgendering hurts. spoiler - it does. edit - fwiw, i keep hearing that lemmy is friendlier than reddit. this doesn't align with my experience so far, it's the same hateful shit as always. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago I'm not saying it doesnt, even in my original post I said they aren't "AS" hurt. Why not try giving a "sir" to 100 trans women and 100 cis women and see how the reactions differ? The way I understand it, you're saying there wont be any difference in reaction. That's naive. It's a trigger! Just like how I can get uncomfortable when someone talks about s.assault but it isn't a trigger for me. If I'm in a group session with people recovering from trauma, I'm going to be very careful talking about SA but if I'm with colleagues I might speak more directly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) You think you're so damn clever for appropriating the inclusive folks' argument and trying to throw it back at them, but you really aren't. We can all see you for the dishonest concern troll that you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I just find it unsettling that those comments only seems to care about the trans. Yeah, no shit: that's because cis people are cared about by default. Nobody needs you white-knighting for the already-advantaged. But we both know you already knew that. I'm continuing to not buy your dishonest concern-trolling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lowleveldata@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago ok? You're free to not buy what you don't want to permalink fedilink source parent [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not endorsing what PsychedSy is saying (esp in the replies), but I am calling you out for saying that being aware of differing needs of trans people is transphobic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. There is something uncomfortable about saying that trans women are on average more unstable. But I think that's more about the word choice "unstable" where I would frame it more neutrally like "different needs". I guess "unstable" sounds like it's their fault/failing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago Let me help. Trans women are (on average) less stable and easier to hurt. We done here? permalink fedilink source parent [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Nah. Ignoring blahaj won't help. Soz, bitch. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (2 children) cis women aren't as hurt by misgendering. not transphobic, just aware. not anti-feminist, they're advocating for gender neutral language. holster your shit lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago cis women aren't as hurt by misgendering Nice generalization. permalink fedilink source parent [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -10 points 2 years ago (3 children) That's implying trans women are less stable and easier to hurt because they are trans. That's transphobic. Assuming cis women don't get hurt by misgendering is sexist at best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Homie I work in mental health and recognizing a trigger is not a force of systemic oppression, it's a courtesy. Pretending everything is hunky dory and no one has differing needs or experiences is the "i dont see color" equivalent of gender. why would cis women even have that trigger?? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] braxy29@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) try talking to some ciswomen and find out if misgendering hurts. spoiler - it does. edit - fwiw, i keep hearing that lemmy is friendlier than reddit. this doesn't align with my experience so far, it's the same hateful shit as always. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago I'm not saying it doesnt, even in my original post I said they aren't "AS" hurt. Why not try giving a "sir" to 100 trans women and 100 cis women and see how the reactions differ? The way I understand it, you're saying there wont be any difference in reaction. That's naive. It's a trigger! Just like how I can get uncomfortable when someone talks about s.assault but it isn't a trigger for me. If I'm in a group session with people recovering from trauma, I'm going to be very careful talking about SA but if I'm with colleagues I might speak more directly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) You think you're so damn clever for appropriating the inclusive folks' argument and trying to throw it back at them, but you really aren't. We can all see you for the dishonest concern troll that you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I just find it unsettling that those comments only seems to care about the trans. Yeah, no shit: that's because cis people are cared about by default. Nobody needs you white-knighting for the already-advantaged. But we both know you already knew that. I'm continuing to not buy your dishonest concern-trolling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lowleveldata@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago ok? You're free to not buy what you don't want to permalink fedilink source parent [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not endorsing what PsychedSy is saying (esp in the replies), but I am calling you out for saying that being aware of differing needs of trans people is transphobic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. There is something uncomfortable about saying that trans women are on average more unstable. But I think that's more about the word choice "unstable" where I would frame it more neutrally like "different needs". I guess "unstable" sounds like it's their fault/failing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago Let me help. Trans women are (on average) less stable and easier to hurt. We done here? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago cis women aren't as hurt by misgendering Nice generalization. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -10 points 2 years ago (3 children) That's implying trans women are less stable and easier to hurt because they are trans. That's transphobic. Assuming cis women don't get hurt by misgendering is sexist at best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Homie I work in mental health and recognizing a trigger is not a force of systemic oppression, it's a courtesy. Pretending everything is hunky dory and no one has differing needs or experiences is the "i dont see color" equivalent of gender. why would cis women even have that trigger?? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] braxy29@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) try talking to some ciswomen and find out if misgendering hurts. spoiler - it does. edit - fwiw, i keep hearing that lemmy is friendlier than reddit. this doesn't align with my experience so far, it's the same hateful shit as always. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago I'm not saying it doesnt, even in my original post I said they aren't "AS" hurt. Why not try giving a "sir" to 100 trans women and 100 cis women and see how the reactions differ? The way I understand it, you're saying there wont be any difference in reaction. That's naive. It's a trigger! Just like how I can get uncomfortable when someone talks about s.assault but it isn't a trigger for me. If I'm in a group session with people recovering from trauma, I'm going to be very careful talking about SA but if I'm with colleagues I might speak more directly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) You think you're so damn clever for appropriating the inclusive folks' argument and trying to throw it back at them, but you really aren't. We can all see you for the dishonest concern troll that you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I just find it unsettling that those comments only seems to care about the trans. Yeah, no shit: that's because cis people are cared about by default. Nobody needs you white-knighting for the already-advantaged. But we both know you already knew that. I'm continuing to not buy your dishonest concern-trolling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lowleveldata@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago ok? You're free to not buy what you don't want to permalink fedilink source parent [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not endorsing what PsychedSy is saying (esp in the replies), but I am calling you out for saying that being aware of differing needs of trans people is transphobic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. There is something uncomfortable about saying that trans women are on average more unstable. But I think that's more about the word choice "unstable" where I would frame it more neutrally like "different needs". I guess "unstable" sounds like it's their fault/failing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago Let me help. Trans women are (on average) less stable and easier to hurt. We done here? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Homie I work in mental health and recognizing a trigger is not a force of systemic oppression, it's a courtesy. Pretending everything is hunky dory and no one has differing needs or experiences is the "i dont see color" equivalent of gender. why would cis women even have that trigger?? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] braxy29@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) try talking to some ciswomen and find out if misgendering hurts. spoiler - it does. edit - fwiw, i keep hearing that lemmy is friendlier than reddit. this doesn't align with my experience so far, it's the same hateful shit as always. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago I'm not saying it doesnt, even in my original post I said they aren't "AS" hurt. Why not try giving a "sir" to 100 trans women and 100 cis women and see how the reactions differ? The way I understand it, you're saying there wont be any difference in reaction. That's naive. It's a trigger! Just like how I can get uncomfortable when someone talks about s.assault but it isn't a trigger for me. If I'm in a group session with people recovering from trauma, I'm going to be very careful talking about SA but if I'm with colleagues I might speak more directly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] braxy29@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) try talking to some ciswomen and find out if misgendering hurts. spoiler - it does. edit - fwiw, i keep hearing that lemmy is friendlier than reddit. this doesn't align with my experience so far, it's the same hateful shit as always. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago I'm not saying it doesnt, even in my original post I said they aren't "AS" hurt. Why not try giving a "sir" to 100 trans women and 100 cis women and see how the reactions differ? The way I understand it, you're saying there wont be any difference in reaction. That's naive. It's a trigger! Just like how I can get uncomfortable when someone talks about s.assault but it isn't a trigger for me. If I'm in a group session with people recovering from trauma, I'm going to be very careful talking about SA but if I'm with colleagues I might speak more directly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago I'm not saying it doesnt, even in my original post I said they aren't "AS" hurt. Why not try giving a "sir" to 100 trans women and 100 cis women and see how the reactions differ? The way I understand it, you're saying there wont be any difference in reaction. That's naive. It's a trigger! Just like how I can get uncomfortable when someone talks about s.assault but it isn't a trigger for me. If I'm in a group session with people recovering from trauma, I'm going to be very careful talking about SA but if I'm with colleagues I might speak more directly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) You think you're so damn clever for appropriating the inclusive folks' argument and trying to throw it back at them, but you really aren't. We can all see you for the dishonest concern troll that you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I just find it unsettling that those comments only seems to care about the trans. Yeah, no shit: that's because cis people are cared about by default. Nobody needs you white-knighting for the already-advantaged. But we both know you already knew that. I'm continuing to not buy your dishonest concern-trolling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lowleveldata@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago ok? You're free to not buy what you don't want to permalink fedilink source parent [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not endorsing what PsychedSy is saying (esp in the replies), but I am calling you out for saying that being aware of differing needs of trans people is transphobic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. There is something uncomfortable about saying that trans women are on average more unstable. But I think that's more about the word choice "unstable" where I would frame it more neutrally like "different needs". I guess "unstable" sounds like it's their fault/failing. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lowleveldata@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I just find it unsettling that those comments only seems to care about the trans. Yeah, no shit: that's because cis people are cared about by default. Nobody needs you white-knighting for the already-advantaged. But we both know you already knew that. I'm continuing to not buy your dishonest concern-trolling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lowleveldata@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago ok? You're free to not buy what you don't want to permalink fedilink source parent [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not endorsing what PsychedSy is saying (esp in the replies), but I am calling you out for saying that being aware of differing needs of trans people is transphobic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. There is something uncomfortable about saying that trans women are on average more unstable. But I think that's more about the word choice "unstable" where I would frame it more neutrally like "different needs". I guess "unstable" sounds like it's their fault/failing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I just find it unsettling that those comments only seems to care about the trans. Yeah, no shit: that's because cis people are cared about by default. Nobody needs you white-knighting for the already-advantaged. But we both know you already knew that. I'm continuing to not buy your dishonest concern-trolling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lowleveldata@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago ok? You're free to not buy what you don't want to permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago ok? You're free to not buy what you don't want to permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not endorsing what PsychedSy is saying (esp in the replies), but I am calling you out for saying that being aware of differing needs of trans people is transphobic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. There is something uncomfortable about saying that trans women are on average more unstable. But I think that's more about the word choice "unstable" where I would frame it more neutrally like "different needs". I guess "unstable" sounds like it's their fault/failing. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. There is something uncomfortable about saying that trans women are on average more unstable. But I think that's more about the word choice "unstable" where I would frame it more neutrally like "different needs". I guess "unstable" sounds like it's their fault/failing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. There is something uncomfortable about saying that trans women are on average more unstable. But I think that's more about the word choice "unstable" where I would frame it more neutrally like "different needs". I guess "unstable" sounds like it's their fault/failing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago Let me help. Trans women are (on average) less stable and easier to hurt. We done here? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Nah. Ignoring blahaj won't help. Soz, bitch. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) This chick has a point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lowleveldata@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago Thanks bro permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago I'm actually really curious what you think you're doing with this shit. You can check but I don't downvote. What's your goal? permalink fedilink source parent