▲ 328 ▼ Godot was the most used game engine for GMTK Game Jam 2026 submissions (i.redd.it) submitted 8 hours ago by Shatur@discuss.tchncs.de to c/godot@programming.dev 40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] vane@lemmy.world 39 points 7 hours ago (2 children) Open source always win. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 2 points 3 hours ago (4 children) Nonsense. I am an open source fan, but I also call it like it is. There are plenty of domains where closed source is still state of the art and open source options are at best inferior, sometimes laughably so. For example CAD/CAM Hardware design: simulation, formal verification, etc. Video editing (Blender's video sequence editor is so close to being good, but still has basic bugs unfortunately - hopefully in a few years I can take this off the list) Audio production, like Fruity Loops. Office software. Sorry but OpenOffice is still not a patch on MS Office. Last time I tried to use it for a presentation it literally reordered my bullet points. Absolutely bizarre bug. And there's a whole host of highly domain specific software that open source will never replace because it's too niche, e.g. Simulink. I once worked on commercial software that solved for elastic wave modes in pipes. Good luck finding open source software to do that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] vane@lemmy.world 1 point 24 minutes ago* I use FreeCAD and OpenSCAD when you can write code instead of draw. Hardware design software is complicated because of hardware patents. For simulation there is Octave, scilab, sympy, einsteinpy and other python projects. For video there is openshot. For audio production there is Sonic Pi, strudel, where you write music by writing code. There is also audacity and fluidsynth. The problem is with VST plugins but it's also problem of standard because VST was created by Steinberg. There is no single software so you need to juggle. For office there are alternatives like OnlyOffice and fork Euro Office, I've seen at least one more office packet from India. Opensource software have no budget and no money, not to mention marketing budget, people make it to use it and share not to sell it. When company dies you end up with no software if it's cloud based or some installer on deprecated operating system. With opensource you can always take the source code and port it to new OS. One opensource project dies, some other is building on it's ashes. You can't kill it as long as at least one person use it and develops it. For ex. elastive wave mode solver if you mean dispersion calculator you can load matlab files to Gnu Octave or look up some specific waves by typing above projects I mentioned with github in search. Of course it's much harder than just type to google what you want and pay money to company that have marketing division and worked out SEO to be first on list. Especially if you have business income that backs it up and limited time, just pay to get it done. It's obvious choice. I assume people are sane. But you can pretty much find all the scientific equivalents on univeristy websites or on github if you really put some effort. It won't be perfect because there was no support that someone paid to solve specific business use case but if you contribute to opensource it will improve and if not you over time someone will do it. Like someone mentioned the process is much slower but eventually it will always win because it's not so much tied to money. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 point 1 hour ago OpenOffice is dead since Apache owns it, you should look in to OnlyOffice or LibreOffice instead permalink fedilink source parent [–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago* I actually think AI development is going to close a lot of these gaps faster than people think. And I think the options for audio and office are pretty decent, LibreOffice definitely does all that I need and there's a healthy community of musicians and audio enthusiasts building things in Linux. Hardware design and CAD have the additional blockers that they require physical manufacturing and open source hardware has a long, long ways to go. Without an ability to actually produce the physical goods, open source software doesn't go anywhere. Kind of a bootstrapping problem. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 child) people use fruity loops after mid 90s kid highschool era? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 hours ago Yes, lots of aspiring electronic music artists do as it seems. Know someone who got an offer from a major label in their genre and FL Studio was one of the tools used to produce those demo tracks IIRC. It's attractive because it's a single purchase rather than a subscription. Of course us mid 90s kids in highschool just pirated it lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 13 points 5 hours ago Eventually. It's a long slow arc. But there's definitely a history of it. From its Inception the modern smartphone has been built almost exclusively on top of Linux or BSD. Even if proprietary presentation layers above it don't always make it perfectly clear. Similar can be said for any modern gaming console or hand held. With the exception of Microsoft's products. Most of the modern internet, your home consumer router and maybe even some of your appliances. Built on open source code. And finally, many are switching to own their PC again. There isn't a lot of hype or fan fair publicly. But open source has been quietly putting in the work and showing up for decades. Realistically, we're actually just returning to a pre Microsoft state. Granted before the explosion of the personal computer most computers were massive devices an individual couldn't own. And there wasn't a lot of money to be made in selling the software itself. So there was a lot of collaboration and sharing. Even if proprietary layers were built on top. The base was vital. We're finally getting back there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 2 points 3 hours ago (4 children) Nonsense. I am an open source fan, but I also call it like it is. There are plenty of domains where closed source is still state of the art and open source options are at best inferior, sometimes laughably so. For example CAD/CAM Hardware design: simulation, formal verification, etc. Video editing (Blender's video sequence editor is so close to being good, but still has basic bugs unfortunately - hopefully in a few years I can take this off the list) Audio production, like Fruity Loops. Office software. Sorry but OpenOffice is still not a patch on MS Office. Last time I tried to use it for a presentation it literally reordered my bullet points. Absolutely bizarre bug. And there's a whole host of highly domain specific software that open source will never replace because it's too niche, e.g. Simulink. I once worked on commercial software that solved for elastic wave modes in pipes. Good luck finding open source software to do that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] vane@lemmy.world 1 point 24 minutes ago* I use FreeCAD and OpenSCAD when you can write code instead of draw. Hardware design software is complicated because of hardware patents. For simulation there is Octave, scilab, sympy, einsteinpy and other python projects. For video there is openshot. For audio production there is Sonic Pi, strudel, where you write music by writing code. There is also audacity and fluidsynth. The problem is with VST plugins but it's also problem of standard because VST was created by Steinberg. There is no single software so you need to juggle. For office there are alternatives like OnlyOffice and fork Euro Office, I've seen at least one more office packet from India. Opensource software have no budget and no money, not to mention marketing budget, people make it to use it and share not to sell it. When company dies you end up with no software if it's cloud based or some installer on deprecated operating system. With opensource you can always take the source code and port it to new OS. One opensource project dies, some other is building on it's ashes. You can't kill it as long as at least one person use it and develops it. For ex. elastive wave mode solver if you mean dispersion calculator you can load matlab files to Gnu Octave or look up some specific waves by typing above projects I mentioned with github in search. Of course it's much harder than just type to google what you want and pay money to company that have marketing division and worked out SEO to be first on list. Especially if you have business income that backs it up and limited time, just pay to get it done. It's obvious choice. I assume people are sane. But you can pretty much find all the scientific equivalents on univeristy websites or on github if you really put some effort. It won't be perfect because there was no support that someone paid to solve specific business use case but if you contribute to opensource it will improve and if not you over time someone will do it. Like someone mentioned the process is much slower but eventually it will always win because it's not so much tied to money. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 point 1 hour ago OpenOffice is dead since Apache owns it, you should look in to OnlyOffice or LibreOffice instead permalink fedilink source parent [–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago* I actually think AI development is going to close a lot of these gaps faster than people think. And I think the options for audio and office are pretty decent, LibreOffice definitely does all that I need and there's a healthy community of musicians and audio enthusiasts building things in Linux. Hardware design and CAD have the additional blockers that they require physical manufacturing and open source hardware has a long, long ways to go. Without an ability to actually produce the physical goods, open source software doesn't go anywhere. Kind of a bootstrapping problem. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 child) people use fruity loops after mid 90s kid highschool era? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 hours ago Yes, lots of aspiring electronic music artists do as it seems. Know someone who got an offer from a major label in their genre and FL Studio was one of the tools used to produce those demo tracks IIRC. It's attractive because it's a single purchase rather than a subscription. Of course us mid 90s kids in highschool just pirated it lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 point 24 minutes ago* I use FreeCAD and OpenSCAD when you can write code instead of draw. Hardware design software is complicated because of hardware patents. For simulation there is Octave, scilab, sympy, einsteinpy and other python projects. For video there is openshot. For audio production there is Sonic Pi, strudel, where you write music by writing code. There is also audacity and fluidsynth. The problem is with VST plugins but it's also problem of standard because VST was created by Steinberg. There is no single software so you need to juggle. For office there are alternatives like OnlyOffice and fork Euro Office, I've seen at least one more office packet from India. Opensource software have no budget and no money, not to mention marketing budget, people make it to use it and share not to sell it. When company dies you end up with no software if it's cloud based or some installer on deprecated operating system. With opensource you can always take the source code and port it to new OS. One opensource project dies, some other is building on it's ashes. You can't kill it as long as at least one person use it and develops it. For ex. elastive wave mode solver if you mean dispersion calculator you can load matlab files to Gnu Octave or look up some specific waves by typing above projects I mentioned with github in search. Of course it's much harder than just type to google what you want and pay money to company that have marketing division and worked out SEO to be first on list. Especially if you have business income that backs it up and limited time, just pay to get it done. It's obvious choice. I assume people are sane. But you can pretty much find all the scientific equivalents on univeristy websites or on github if you really put some effort. It won't be perfect because there was no support that someone paid to solve specific business use case but if you contribute to opensource it will improve and if not you over time someone will do it. Like someone mentioned the process is much slower but eventually it will always win because it's not so much tied to money. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 point 1 hour ago OpenOffice is dead since Apache owns it, you should look in to OnlyOffice or LibreOffice instead permalink fedilink source parent
[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago* I actually think AI development is going to close a lot of these gaps faster than people think. And I think the options for audio and office are pretty decent, LibreOffice definitely does all that I need and there's a healthy community of musicians and audio enthusiasts building things in Linux. Hardware design and CAD have the additional blockers that they require physical manufacturing and open source hardware has a long, long ways to go. Without an ability to actually produce the physical goods, open source software doesn't go anywhere. Kind of a bootstrapping problem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 child) people use fruity loops after mid 90s kid highschool era? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 hours ago Yes, lots of aspiring electronic music artists do as it seems. Know someone who got an offer from a major label in their genre and FL Studio was one of the tools used to produce those demo tracks IIRC. It's attractive because it's a single purchase rather than a subscription. Of course us mid 90s kids in highschool just pirated it lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 hours ago Yes, lots of aspiring electronic music artists do as it seems. Know someone who got an offer from a major label in their genre and FL Studio was one of the tools used to produce those demo tracks IIRC. It's attractive because it's a single purchase rather than a subscription. Of course us mid 90s kids in highschool just pirated it lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 13 points 5 hours ago Eventually. It's a long slow arc. But there's definitely a history of it. From its Inception the modern smartphone has been built almost exclusively on top of Linux or BSD. Even if proprietary presentation layers above it don't always make it perfectly clear. Similar can be said for any modern gaming console or hand held. With the exception of Microsoft's products. Most of the modern internet, your home consumer router and maybe even some of your appliances. Built on open source code. And finally, many are switching to own their PC again. There isn't a lot of hype or fan fair publicly. But open source has been quietly putting in the work and showing up for decades. Realistically, we're actually just returning to a pre Microsoft state. Granted before the explosion of the personal computer most computers were massive devices an individual couldn't own. And there wasn't a lot of money to be made in selling the software itself. So there was a lot of collaboration and sharing. Even if proprietary layers were built on top. The base was vital. We're finally getting back there. permalink fedilink source parent