you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 week ago (1 child)

Residential proxies are a thing.

Also speaking from experience, especially asia based crawlers will send 5 requests at once from one IP, then 5 from the next etc. and the first IP wont appear again for several hours, making ip based rate limiting useless.

In my case i have honeypot links that block them, i block several data center adress ranges, have an automated whitelist for registered users, use some public blocklists and user agent filtering and that takes care of 99% of it. But it is non-trivial compared to rate limiting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    True, I also run crowdsec which blocks excessive 404s and other unusual requests too, between that and rate limiting I don't seem to have any server overload issues for the most part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    In the article they talk about getting hit by millions of different IPs. It's probably on a different level compared to what a random, non-targeted site has to deal with.

    A few years back when graphics cards were getting botted for resale, a friend of a friend was buying with bots using a (pricey) rotating list of hundreds of proxy addresses that would each make attempts at a very reasonable looking frequency. I'm picturing something like that, except with much more funding.

  • source
  • parent