1028
It's just a question (europe.pub)
submitted 4 days ago by to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
137 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 152 points 4 days ago (4 children)

That’s factually false.

He can save a lot of humans every day by doing something humanitarian and does not.

The only logical inference is that his motivation is not saving humans but killing apes.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 71 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Yep, lol.

    Would you kill all apes to save one human? "Sure!"

    Would you donate $500 to save one human? "Fuck no!"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Logical conclusion: "rather kill all apes than donate 500$". Anyone with this mindset is a trash human being.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Maybe he just loves killing?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Besides, if he DID kill all apes, the damage to complex ecosystems across the world that rely on interdependent species including apes would DEFINITELY lead to the deaths of more than one human.

    Probably at least two.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago* (1 child)

    Technically if he killed all apes killing all humans would be part of that process.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    That's technically still within the "at least two" range 😉

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    The best kind of correct.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    The best kind of correct is where somebody sees the error of their ways and becomes a better person and its because you were goddamn right.

    'Technically correct' is , at best, the 3rd best kind of correct.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •