From the Interstellar wikipedia page: The resulting visual effects provided Thorne with new insight into the gravitational lensing and accretion disks surrounding black holes, resulting in the publication of three scientific papers.[71][72][73]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 39 points 1 month ago (1 child)

The paper does state that no astrophysical insights were gained, more insights on how to produce pretty yet accurate images. But still, cool!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    No, it's really not.

    Christopher Nolan's screenplays tend to be hit or miss, and Interstellar is deep in the "miss" category

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    That's like, your opinion man.

    Interstellar is a great movie

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The story is a complete mess that hinges on every scientist involved being extremely incompetent

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Interstellar is the sort of movie that would have done a lot better in the hands of a director like Spielberg. Nolan's dry, clinical, super grounded approach is unspeakably jarring in a movie whose ultimate thesis is that love is a kind of fundamental force. It wants to be a magic-realist fantasy, but Nolan tries to treat it like a pseudo-documentary.

  • source
  • parent