▲ 529 ▼ ???? (mander.xyz) submitted 3 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 156 points 3 months ago (3 children) That is way more impressive. Any idiot can eat a baby. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 42 points 3 months ago (2 children) Who would you rather fight: one mumma sized hamster or 5 baby sized hamsters? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago (1 child) Depends on the species of the mumma / baby used to size the hamsters. Amoeba: I'm taking the 5 babies. It'll be harder but I still like my chances. Oak Tree: I think my only chance is to take the babies, Though I'd be tempted to choose momma just to marvel at such a creature. Elephant: No good options here, in a fair fight I'd lose either match. I think my only shot is to choose the momma hamster and try to win through trickery. Hummingbird: I would lose via forfeit. They're too cute I can't do it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago Hummingbirds I get, but you're telling me scientists finally figured out how to get elephants to bone hamsters? permalink fedilink source parent [–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 point 3 months ago I'm going to have to go with Ditka. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SmokedBillionaire@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago (1 child) Tarrare, is that you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 months ago (1 child) wow, TIL. Poor guy. That whole wikipedia page reads like a tall tale. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago “No fork was found.” permalink fedilink source parent [–] tdawg@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (3 children) But can any baby eat an idiot? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 months ago I would love to find out but the man keeps denying my grant applications. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) No way. Babies can't even have fucking honey, my money is on the idiot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ElectricMachman@geostationary.orbiting.observer 3 points 3 months ago Counterpoint: babies will chomp anything within an inch of their faces. Given enough time the idiot might just get gummed to death permalink fedilink source parent [–] starik@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago Mashed carrots are about as dumb as they come, so yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 42 points 3 months ago (2 children) Who would you rather fight: one mumma sized hamster or 5 baby sized hamsters? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago (1 child) Depends on the species of the mumma / baby used to size the hamsters. Amoeba: I'm taking the 5 babies. It'll be harder but I still like my chances. Oak Tree: I think my only chance is to take the babies, Though I'd be tempted to choose momma just to marvel at such a creature. Elephant: No good options here, in a fair fight I'd lose either match. I think my only shot is to choose the momma hamster and try to win through trickery. Hummingbird: I would lose via forfeit. They're too cute I can't do it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago Hummingbirds I get, but you're telling me scientists finally figured out how to get elephants to bone hamsters? permalink fedilink source parent [–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 point 3 months ago I'm going to have to go with Ditka. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago (1 child) Depends on the species of the mumma / baby used to size the hamsters. Amoeba: I'm taking the 5 babies. It'll be harder but I still like my chances. Oak Tree: I think my only chance is to take the babies, Though I'd be tempted to choose momma just to marvel at such a creature. Elephant: No good options here, in a fair fight I'd lose either match. I think my only shot is to choose the momma hamster and try to win through trickery. Hummingbird: I would lose via forfeit. They're too cute I can't do it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago Hummingbirds I get, but you're telling me scientists finally figured out how to get elephants to bone hamsters? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago Hummingbirds I get, but you're telling me scientists finally figured out how to get elephants to bone hamsters? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 point 3 months ago I'm going to have to go with Ditka. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmokedBillionaire@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago (1 child) Tarrare, is that you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 months ago (1 child) wow, TIL. Poor guy. That whole wikipedia page reads like a tall tale. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago “No fork was found.” permalink fedilink source parent
[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 months ago (1 child) wow, TIL. Poor guy. That whole wikipedia page reads like a tall tale. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago “No fork was found.” permalink fedilink source parent
[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago “No fork was found.” permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (3 children) But can any baby eat an idiot? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 months ago I would love to find out but the man keeps denying my grant applications. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) No way. Babies can't even have fucking honey, my money is on the idiot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ElectricMachman@geostationary.orbiting.observer 3 points 3 months ago Counterpoint: babies will chomp anything within an inch of their faces. Given enough time the idiot might just get gummed to death permalink fedilink source parent [–] starik@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago Mashed carrots are about as dumb as they come, so yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 months ago I would love to find out but the man keeps denying my grant applications. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) No way. Babies can't even have fucking honey, my money is on the idiot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ElectricMachman@geostationary.orbiting.observer 3 points 3 months ago Counterpoint: babies will chomp anything within an inch of their faces. Given enough time the idiot might just get gummed to death permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ElectricMachman@geostationary.orbiting.observer 3 points 3 months ago Counterpoint: babies will chomp anything within an inch of their faces. Given enough time the idiot might just get gummed to death permalink fedilink source parent
[–] starik@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago Mashed carrots are about as dumb as they come, so yes. permalink fedilink source parent