you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 176 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I’ll never understand how people were OK with putting middlemen with an interest in denying care between them and lifesaving treatment.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 120 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    because apparently, the alternative is communism, and it will have death panels that will decide if you get to live in order to save costs...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Insurance companies are deathpanels though...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I believe that was their point...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago*

    Well maybe they are private enterprise death panels, but they trust them more than theoretical government death panels because the private sector is more efficient than government at cutting costs, such as, um, actually paying for needed care and oh shit they did not think that through.

    edit: I meant to reply that to the comment above, but oh well. It's here now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    that was my point.

    they prefer real material death panels, than the alternative, because it might have theoretical death panels. that no country with public healthcare has.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The danger of commenting first thing after waking up!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    same, haven't got my coffee yet, how do you take yours?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Insurance is worse than communism in this case.

    Tax paid universal healthcare and healthcare insurance both work on the idea of socializing the cost.

    The difference is that insurance companies also need to make a profit too feed the owners. Since they don't actually produce anything that can make a profit, the only place they can grab the "profit" is by denying cover.

    American healthcare insurance is exactly the same picture that is shown when people try to explain why communism doesn't work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Tax paid universal healthcare and healthcare insurance both work on the idea of socializing the cost.

    I think if we used their language it might help: we should outsource healthcare costs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    The Acquired podcast went over this history very briefly in their Epic episode and it's so crazy how close we were to having universal healthcare.

    Tl;dl:

    • during WW2, wage controls were in place due to a large demand of workers but very few people available due to being in the war
    • unions and companies alike were looking for ways to make their positions and companies more attractive.
    • government permitted benefits to augment salaries. Some companies started offering health insurance.
    • back then going to the doctor was NOT the bankrupt causing thing that is today and was considered a fringe benefit
    • larger companies were able to offer better incentives due to healthcare benefits
    • add a few years of corruption and "market forces" and you have the system we have now

    So blame wage controls during WW2.

    Oh and the Brits were facing similar forces when they were starting to stand up their healthcare system but decided instead to hire people to build a robust system so everyone didn't have to pay anything at the point of sale.

    Yeah, it really was that simple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Universal healthcare is one of those things that's not only tricky to set up but also to keep going. Here in the UK, yep the NHS is amazing. But it's also terribly underfunded - despite taking over 10% of GDP (IIRC) we still have long waiting lists, and healthcare staff are overworked and underpaid. Greedy vermin are constantly looking for opportunities to privatise it, the only reason this hasn't already happened is that it would be hugely unpopular. I'm pretty sure almost everyone in the country would prefer more taxes be spent on the NHS and maybe a bit less on, say, fossil fuel subsidies - but here we are. Still, it's one of the few things our country can actually be proud of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    the only reason long waiting lists don't exist in the us is because some people just are not getting the things they need done at all. Even people with insurance you often can't find a specialist who takes it and the insurance denies things like in the article. The wait is very long when its impossible to get the treatment at all.

  • source
  • parent