you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 5 months ago

Literally already addressed that, but go off

You raised the packing coefficient by ⅝ to squeeze one extra square in with all that wasted space, so don't argue that 25 squares has a packing coefficient of 5. Another ⅜ will get you an extra 8 squares, and no wasted space.

  • source
  • parent