770
The Design is Very Human (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

having a moment here in gnome

to everyone pointing out that this is for touchpads;

a: it's awful on that too

b: note the mouse in the example given

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -7 points 2 years ago* (8 children)

And as far as I'm concerned, all games should have their fucking y axis inverted as default so I don't have to keep turning it on.

If I have a camera on a tripod and I angle down...the view goes up. If I angle up, the view goes down. That's how it works. Or, I guess, how my mind works at least.

If someone grabbed my (steadily getting overgrown) hair from the back and yank down, my eyesight will move up. And vice versa.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It’s the same with left versus right, which nobody has yet talked about. It you angled my head right, my vision would be turning towards the left. Both of these need to be inverted.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    The way my brain rationalizes it (inverted y, normal x) is that the closest analog to my hand on a mouse is my hand on top of my character’s head.

    To make that head look up I pull my hand back, which is the same exact motion as pulling the mouse back. So it feels natural.

    To make the head look left, I would rotate my hand counterclockwise. Rotating a mouse doesn’t do anything, so I have to translate that to lateral motion, and left to look left feels more natural.

    Of course the real explanation is that the first mouselook games I played defaulted to inverted y and normal x, so that’s what I got used to. And even before mouselook became a thing, I was playing flight sims, which default to inverted y. Still, it’s fun to try to rationalize something that ultimately boils down muscle memory.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If I have a camera on a tripod and I angle down...the view goes up. If I angle up, the view goes down.

    I much prefer a simpler analogy: If I look up, I look up. If I look down, I look down.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    It's not any simpler, you're just changing the frame of reference relative to the fulcrum point. His example is just as valid. If you're controlling from behind the fulcrum inverted is perfectly intuitive.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I personally invert the axes in third person scenarios because the camera moves around the character and i want to move the camera.

    Within first person shooters i don't because i move the camera/head to where i want to look.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    I did this with a controller for the longest time. Specifically, the thing was not first/third person byt "do I have a visible crosshair or not", as that defined if I am directly moving the camera/head, or if the crosshair is like a laser pointer I move on the screen and the character looks towards it.
    I finally had to decide one way or the other with Monster Hunter: World as the sling requires switching between the two rapidly and while you actually can set separate inverts for first and third person, it means you can't "follow" a monster smoothly while switching to the sling, you need to also quickly flick the stick to the other direction. Took me roughly 20 hours of rather chaotic gameplay for it to finally "click" in an instant.
    I chose non-inverted as it was easier to imagine a crosshair than it was to ignore one that existed.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    If you imagine the mouse strapped to the back of your head, then moving it up would tilt your head down, but it would also tilt you head left when you moved it right. So if you want to use realism (in this mouse behind the head scenario) as an argument for inversion then you would need left and right inverted too.

    However, if you strap the mouse to your face, now if you move the mouse up, your head tilts up aswell. If you move it right, you look right. And given in 1st person games the camera is at the front of the head, this is why non-inverted is preferred.

    The only argument for either is personal preference and more people prefer the latter, non-inverted, which is why it is not the default.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Spoken like a gentleman who drinks his orange juice warm while eating his daily tune of toothpaste.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •