[+] -30 points 7 hours ago* (3 children)

I’m not trusting THEM lol, people are told to avoid going online due to toxicity and this exact crap. And this is why I said using them was useless… you are STILL using it lmfao. Even after trying to avoid this exact conversation….

I trust the internet to do what it always does, there’s gonna be users that did it, even “jokingly”. That’s the sad unfortunate reality that we do live in. I wish we lived in your imaginary fantasy world, that would be great!

I’m “trusting” that the internet is doing what it always has and always will do, and not something totally unprecedented that it’s never done before.

Again, people are told to avoid social media because OF THIS EXACT CRAP HAPPING OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND…..

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -24 points 7 hours ago* (4 children)

    Someone needs to press charges for law enforcement to do anything or even get involved. And to press charges you need to be “involved” or have been affected.

    And that person is gonna get called to court and have their history exposed, courts don’t like people who aggravate others than go and waste courts time with charges.

    Lawyers get disbarred for that crap, it’s illegal itself.

    You can’t provoke someone in to shooting you than press charges, that’s what this would be like.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -31 points 7 hours ago* (5 children)

    One side has the general internet on its side. We already know what they do.

    What other evidence is needed? Any they provide would just be called fake, but the internet always does this. I don’t believe that Lemmy users would be innocent in this singular incident, that’s just foolish thinking.

    There’s nothing that will meet your arbitrary standards here, but don’t go playing dumb, you just make the rest of Lemmy users looks bad with the rest of you.

    This is all universal “you” for anyone involved in this drama on either side.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -40 points 8 hours ago* (8 children)

    And somehow I knew that was gonna be the response *shrug*.

    Online people constantly do this, it’s joked about since it’s a real thing that ALWAYS happen. If you think Lemmy users are innocent this singular time, is there some Bridges for you to buy.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -24 points 8 hours ago* (3 children)

    I never said it did? I just said Lemmy users should look at themselves first, they did illegal shit first.

    Or are you taking my response to quokka and attributing that to my first response to slayer? Because that’s not the same discussion. So don’t take that out of context.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -46 points 8 hours ago* (22 children)

    Uhh… their goodbye post where they lay it out? That’s what this post is based on… and taken from…?

    Or are you only seeing the one side of the story you choose to see and ignoring the other? Sounds typical of Lemmy users to be honest, so that’s rhetorical.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -49 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (43 children)

    ? What do you even know of the story if that’s your take…? They were being doxxed, getting death threats, harassed, etc. all of these are cybercrimes….

    Lemmy users never want to be held accountable for their actions, but love calling others out *shrug*

    If you think it was just jokes and memes, you need to actually read into the details

    What they did isn’t okay, but the response to that from the Lemmy users was equally unacceptable, and their response here is the middle finger.

    They know nothing is likely to happen, because who’s gonna press charges? The people that also did illegal shit that started it…? Seriously lmfao.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›