cross-posted from: https://quokk.au/c/fediverse/p/1066667/tesseract-dev-injects-malicious-code-into-browser-to-illegally-ddos-the-dbzer0-instance

As part of the devs farewell message on their site, they have included malicious code to make each visitor sends 2,000 requests to the dbzer0 servers in an attempt to DDOS and take the instance offline.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 55 points 13 hours ago* (50 children)

Making memes and fun of a shitty block list is not illegal.

Cyber crime, as awesome as it sounds , however is illegal. Not that we would want to bring cops into anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 54 child comments
  • [+] -53 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (47 children)

    ? What do you even know of the story if that’s your take…? They were being doxxed, getting death threats, harassed, etc. all of these are cybercrimes….

    Lemmy users never want to be held accountable for their actions, but love calling others out *shrug*

    If you think it was just jokes and memes, you need to actually read into the details

    What they did isn’t okay, but the response to that from the Lemmy users was equally unacceptable, and their response here is the middle finger.

    They know nothing is likely to happen, because who’s gonna press charges? The people that also did illegal shit that started it…? Seriously lmfao.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 50 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

    Well, yeah, people who done that should also be investigated. How does this contradicts slazer2au's point?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -26 points 12 hours ago* (1 child)

    I never said it did? I just said Lemmy users should look at themselves first, they did illegal shit first.

    Or are you taking my response to quokka and attributing that to my first response to slayer? Because that’s not the same discussion. So don’t take that out of context.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    "Lemmy users" is pretty vague.

    Unless you are accusing the specific users you're replying to of the crimes you're bringing up, what's the point of responding to them?

    I didn't do any of the things you're bringing up. Why would a response asking "lemmy users too look at themselves" be relevant to me?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -22 points 12 hours ago* (1 child)

    Does the concept of “context” not exist to you?

    Specific topics don’t need to specified when it’s contextual conversation.

    That’s what this is, you’re of course free to take it wrongly and interpret that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

    You're whataboutisming along the lines of "you should think about you've done first" to people who probably aren't even the ones who did the things you're bringing up.

    You're not commenting to add that people were dicks to the tesseract dev, too.

    You're commenting that people were dicks to the tesseract dev first, and pushing everything that putting it that way implies.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (44 replies)
  • load more comments (46 replies)