[–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

And I can use it for hotspot data for no additional cost

From a European perspective (no idea about other places) this sounds so ridiculous. You pay for internet. Why should they be allowed to dictate if you can hotspot it or not

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    I have actually used ModX for quite a while. Was pretty nice compared to other CMS's. But i agree with the other comments that a CMS seems like overkill for your use case and flat file is probably better

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    They already have a monopoly. The amount of people using FF is pretty small unfortunately. And there's a bunch of sites that only test in Chrome and sometimes even actively "block" Firefox like here without making an effort to check for capabilities instead of user agent.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago* (6 children)

    you know, I'd really love to get a good app that i pay for and that in turn doesn't collect or sell my data and has no ads, but there's so many but's.

    • one time payment is not sustainable for development
    • i can't have a subscription for each and every app
    • with free and fairly decent apps from big Corp like Google photos, most people won't bother

    just to say: I'm not sure there is a good solution where everyone wins :/

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    it was actively prompting to enable the feature during or shortly after setup which could be easily confused for being part of the process and most people i know didn't actively read it, activated it and then where wondering why they get messages from X (sms) suddenly in signal, or assuming people are on signal, because it suggested regular contacts as well (which would be unencrypted sms)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    Google doing the same thing with chrome, sabotaging youtube under Firefox, etc.

    i want to see both of them fined heavily and best case forced to split some of their products out to separate companies (not sure how much that helps though)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Hi, I have successfully set up Keycloak and use it for a few of the applications that I'm running (unfortunately not every app supports oauth2/oidc yet).

    However there's one issue I haven't been able to resolve yet: I want to restrict access to certain applications (like portainer) to specific users (me).

    I've already tried going to the portainer client > Authorization, added a role based policy and added the policy to the default permission, but other users that don't have this role can still log in. If I go to "Evaluate" it gives me the expected correct result for the different users

    view more: next ›