[–] 3 points 7 hours ago

No, it's not hype, but in many cases a straight out lie. We are governed by corrupt sell-outs while defunding education and a 24/7 stream of brain rot has the majority of voters blame (often illusionary) minorities while getting openly fucked by corporations and their governments.

They cry about digital sovereignity while buying solutions from Microsoft's or Google's EuRoPeAn cloud solutions that are a scam with zero sovereignity.

They talk about sovereign chip development while defunding education and research and subsidizing Intel.

They lament about a need for sovereign AI while just pushing surveilance and abolishing data protection so they can sell all our data to the big US companies... and now Palantir on top.

Oh and of course we totally need more US run data centers for those "sovereign" cloud and AI solutiuns somehow.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Und was sind die großen Anwendungsgebiete für moderne Batterien? Oh... die Autoindustrie, tragbare Elektronik und das Stromnetz. Also wurde politisch gezielt dafür gesorgt, dass es hier kein Anwendungsgebiet gab, und VARTA hat fröhlich weiter altertümliche Bleibatterien produzieren können.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    Those headlines were the usual "mention (seemingly) big numbers without context"-bullshit. You can easily look up the actual amount of packages in the AUR...

    They also did not "inject malicious code into AUR packages" because of some insecurity that needed fixing. They simply took over orphaned packages then modified them.

    So actual reality boils down to:malicious actors took over a miniscule amount of AUR packages with so little public interest nobody even maintained them. And the AUR is as secure as it ever was. Which means not very secure at all because it's public community content without any vetting. So look up the package and actually read the PKGFILE. Just as Arch is vocally warning you.

    99.9% of changes are version numbering, checksum and rarely slight dependency changes. There is no chance anyone affected by a long orphaned package that got taken over and modified did ever read that one stupid file of just a few lines (or just the dif provided by several AUR helpers automatically).

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    Naja, passt halt in das übliche Narrativ der nötigen Entbürokratisierung (lies: Deregulierung für die reichen Kumpels und Einsparungen, um das System kaputt zu machen, als de facto Deregulierung durch die Hintertür).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago* (3 children)

    ein Fall von Innovationen verschlafen wie so oft bei der deutschen Industrie

    Die Darstellung verfehlt halt immer die Realität. Das Problem ist nicht die deutsche Industrie, die immer Inovationen verschläft, sondern die institutionelle Korruption, durch die es stets billiger ist, wenn die Politik einem jede Konkurrenz vom Hals hält, weil das Investitionskosten in Optimierung und Verbesserung spart und Gewinnn kurzfristig optimiert.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 21 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Wiedermal völliger Blödsinn, um erneut das Märchen davon unter die Leute zu bringen, dass die AfD irgendetwas richtig macht, an dem man sich orientieren sollte.

    Nein, die AfD hat keine Visionen. Sie lügt. Ununterbrochen und ungestraft. Und genau in letzterem liegt das Problem. Nein, natürlich lösen wir es nicht, in dem wir uns überschlagen, jeder neuen infamen Lüge einen Faktencheck hinterher zu werfen. Genauso wenig hilft es aber sich an der Scheiße zu orientieren. Lügen und Hetze müssen schlichtweg endlich tatsächliche rechtliche Konsequenzen haben. Warum wir das nicht hinkriegen? Fragt den selben Abschaum, der ein AfD Verbotsverfahren blockiert, weil sie immer noch glauben mit den selben faschistischen Propagandataktiken genauso Erfolg haben zu können wie die Faschisten.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 day ago*

    Sein Ernst? Nö. Konservative nehmen tatsächlich gar nichts ernst. Die erzählen einfach immer genau die Lüge, die gerade populär zu sein scheint, und ignorieren danach alles gesagte ("Was kümmert mich mein Geschätz von..." und so).

    "Unser" Ernst? Ja, klar. "Wir", die Deutschen, sind geisteskrank dumm und unterstützen derzeit nach Umfragen zu mehr als 60% entweder den derzeitigen Regierungswahnsinn oder wollen die selbe Scheiße, aber bitte in noch radikaler und noch korrupter.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Oh, I understand the difference between what we talk about. My problem is that I don't believe any of their plans, when their actions are contrary to those plans.

    They might say that they have battery tech plans, but they actually sabotage the main sectors using large modern batteries (transport and power grid). They might say they have fusion plans, but they don't actually increase any spending in research and just use it as an empty talking point (for example when painting "renewables as just an interim solution" - paraphrasing Merz). They might talk a lot about chip design and AI and how to build up a skilled work force, but don't actually invest into education (quite the contrary: the educational sector is ailing in every conceivable aspect).

    I simple know their story telling quite well by now. They try to sell the same future fairy tales for decades: climate neutral renewable energy soon - while actually subsidising coal and limiting grid upkeep/-build to keep fossil fuels relevant no matter how much clean, cheap energy is actually produced; digitalisation - actually just a buzz word to justify more cost cutting in already overworked sectors and deregulation for their industry buddies (sometimes just defacto deregulation by pushing supervisors to the breaking point); less bureaucracy - again just cost cutting to break the system, then cry that obviously even more cuts are needed; and my recent favorite: a massive amount of debt to invest in infrastructure and economy - to then waste it all on other stuff and manage to actually invest even less than in former years.

    Yes, they have a published high-tech agenda. It's a lie because lying is all they do.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago

    Zumindest macht er dann nur mit dem selben Scheiß wie vorher weiter. Seine eigenen Ideen von zentralen, staatlich geführten Listen über alle psychischen Erkrankungen wären ja noch eine Steigerung.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
    server {
    	listen 80 default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name _; 
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                    \# that's where all actual stuff is located
    	}
    }
    # reroute http traffic with hostname to https
    server {
    	listen 80;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
    	location / {
    		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    	}
    }
    server {
    	listen 443 ssl default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
       	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
        	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
    	}
    }
    #actual content here...
    server {
    	listen 5555;
    	http2 on;
        	root /srv/http;
    	location / {
            	index index.html;
       	} 
        	location = /page1 {
    		return 301 page1.html;
    	}
        	location = /page2 {
    		return 301 page2.html;
    	}
            #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
    	location /dav/ {
    		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
    	}
    }
    

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›