I can change button numbers, result numbers and even history numbers all bigger on the settings, EXCEPT for those ones marked on red; they're so tiny that they are harder to read!

Hi, there!

Newbie question here: basically, the title. Perhaps what I'm asking is pretty obvious, but I'd like to double-check with the community on this.

I use Discover on my Debian KDE Plasma set-up, with Flatpaks enabled (but not Snaps). Sometimes, I come across apps (I did just yesterday, searching for translation apps to replace DeepL), that have according to its page, an unknown author and, sometimes, even an unkown licence, but which do require access permission to the whole system (this latter requirement applying specifically to Deb packages, from what I've seen).

Under these circumstances, is it safe to assume that such apps will still be safe because of the fact that they appear listed on Discover (in other words, is Discover a guarantee of safety for the apps it shows, as in, some type of checked or proved content), or should I still be wary of potentially malicious software included on it?

Thank you very much in advance :)

With DeepL moving to AWS, I'll obviously stop using it and I am thus in search of a new translator solution.

I feel, however, as if most translators are jumping to AI and I do not trust the technology enough, so the question arises: are there any good AI-free translators left? I need both for PC and an Android app; searching on F Droid and Discover (KDE Plasma) brings some results, but I thought of asking you guys if you recommend something in particular.

Thank you very much and have a nice day :)

I admit this is something I do not know much about, not something I had thought of previously to going all open source, so my question might make sense, or it might not.

So, I'm currently writing a novel and, thus, making heavy use of text processors. Since I switched to Debian and to LibreOffice as well, I also decided to change my novel document format from Transitional OOXML to ODT moved by philosophy and belief in open standards. Yes, I was previously writing it on M. Word so that was the default doc format and my font was Calibri for most of the text. This was not a deliberate decision and was also not intended to be final, but something I would think about later on.

Well, now it is later on, and what's sparked my curiosity has been all this change I've been doing. So, when I opened LibreOffice for the first time and saw 'Liberation Serif' as the default font, it got thinking: are font letters open/free/libre, in the sense open source apps and formats are? Are they owned to some capacity by someone, or is it safe to assume that most fonts bundled with text editors have an open licence? If not, is there something I should be wary about this if I care about open standards?

Thank you in advance for any insight you can provide :)

Does this even make sense to you? I acknowledge I am not an experienced Linux user yet, but this seems most weird to me; why would KDE Plasma offer me to update GNOME?

For context, I am using Debian 13 Stable, which I installed just with KDE Plasma - so I'm not running more than one DE, nor did I install more than this.

Could you recommend some trusted Linux-related forums? For troubleshooting assitance, discussion and what-not.

Obviously, a good place to start would be your distro's user forum, such as those of Debian, Mint, etc.; as well as your DE's, such as that of KDE. Also, I trust this one here on Lemmy as well.

But, searching on the web, I also came across some generally-focused Linux forums that I wasn't sure were as trustworthy. I mean, perhaps they were, but, being a newbie to this world, I'd rather hear from you guys what places you go when having an issue with your system or things of the like.

Thank you and have a nice Tuesday!

Good day, folks!

I hope you won’t mind helping me with some troubleshooting.

I currently run Debian 13 Stable with KDE Plasma (Wayland). I have an Asus laptop with an AMD Vega integrated GPU and an Nvidia 2060 Mobile dedicated GPU.

Error shown in the attached GIF. Had to shorten it, but the flickering repeats non stop.

First of all, I’m sorry I can’t provide you with a video; I tried attaching it to the post but won’t let me attach any other than photos.

This issue shows up at random: when closing the lid and thus leaving the system suspended, I later open it up to continue using it and the bug manifests. The screen brightness ‘flashes’ and increasing or decreasing brightness manually doesn’t solve it. Most times, it suffices with closing the lid and opening it up again for the issue to disappear and, for the times it doesn’t work, a reboot is needed.

Now, one might think that this is an Nvidia driver-related issue. While I currently haven’t installed the proprietary driver and, thus, I suppose the open source Nouveau driver is in place instead, what makes me discard that possibility is that, prior to Debian, I tried Ubuntu and Mint (based on the former), in both of which I did install such Nvidia drivers, and the exact same issue occurred.

As far as I know, the AMD drivers are included with the Linux kernel, so that shouldn’t be the issue (?)

It doesn’t seem to be a Wayland issue either, since I’ve tried both X11 and Wayland, the issue showing up on both.

Finally, if it’s worth mentioning, this issue didn’t happen back on Windows. Not that I am planning on going back, rest assured.

I am thus out of ideas as to what might be causing this or what else try to do. I appreciate any clues you could provide me with.

Thank you in advance :)

As to why I still decided to purchase it, I also happen to be strongly anti-plastic, and this was the only bottle made out of glass in the oil section that wasn't absurdly highly priced.

I mean, I wish I am wrong and it is actually human-made; what do you reckon?

I run Debian 13 Stable with KDE Plasma, and have Flathub enabled on KDE's Discover software store. I have a slight idea of the difference between the two: that Debian packages share system libraries and are therefore lighter in storage but do require password to access those shared libraries and could therefore become a security hazard if installing from an untrusted source, while Flatpaks have all they need and don't require password to install, being more secure that way, but, as a consequence, consume more storage. Also noticeable is the fact that, for some programmes, the Flatpak version tends to be more recent and it therefore becomes the obvious choice when looking for the latest software.

However, I was looking at the SuperTux game, and what's curious about this is that both, the Debian package and the Flatpak are version 0.6.3, while consuming 6.7 and 259,9 MB of storage respectively.

So should the obvious choice here be the Debian package, or would you still go for the Flatpak? I am not asking this because I'm particularly interested on this game as much as to learn more about the two system packages and whether my assumptions are correct or I am missing something.

Thank you and have a nice weekend!

Edit: Thank yoy to all commenters! I've learnt a bunch thanks to your replies to this post :)

I have been reading on The Document Foundation blog about the ODF and how Microsoft basically gaslighted us all into believing the OOXML is truly an open standard when it actually doesn't even use the ISO's standardised version of strict OOXML as a default in his office suit, which obviously makes ODF the better choice; but I am not knowledgeable about the PDF.

From what I've found, it was developed by Adobe up until 2008; since then, it is an "open standard" supposedly developed by the ISO.

Does this mean the Portable Document Format is legit the way ODF is? If not what would be the open alternative to PDF that ODF is to Microslop's?

I am learning about community-based Linux distros as they are my preferred choice compared to corporate ones. And when I get to Fedora, what I see from the fence is a sofisticated, well-supported OS.

However, seeing that it is sponsored by the Red Hat corporation, the question arises: could Red Hat eventually take control of the project? I suppose the answer comes down to how much weight Red Hat actually has on the development of said distro. From what I know, it has employees dedicated full-time to it.

Let's rephrase the question and say that the Fedora project ditched Red Hat from its development due to some irrepairable decision; how viable would the continuation of the OS development be as compared to, for example, Debian, which is also community-based but, as far as I know, has no such backing from a corporation?

Please, note that, while I am indeed a Debian user, I am not trying in any way to shit on Fedora. I myself am curious to try it out as I have recently arrived to Linux.