It is 100% AI. Some of the strands of hair fuse into each other, and it's got that AI sheen.
When will companies realize this just makes them look cheap and lazy?
It is 100% AI. Some of the strands of hair fuse into each other, and it's got that AI sheen.
When will companies realize this just makes them look cheap and lazy?
Looks AI to me too. The hair especially on the right makes no sense. There are other questionable aesthetic decisions here, which of course aren't really decisions since nobody made it.
I always find that AI art has a kind of, lightly blurred edges look to it. There's rarely any solid lines, in any style it does.
Corridor on youtube have some great videos on why A.I "art" looks the way it does. The idea is that it always tries to offset colours. If it has a bunch of light colours it needs to have a bunch of dark colors. Overall that gives these pictures that cartoon look, and why they pretty much always look the same or similar.
Idk why, it might be inaccurate and just gut feeling but they always have that...look to the generated art. Was reading news just now about domestic abuse simply because of craving for a dish, and the news agency use an AI generated image of that dish. At first glance i really went "is this AI? This looks AI" and the description then declare it's ai generated.
all 10 comments