all 36 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 2 years ago

Good for them.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Whatever Korean is for Mazel Tov, I wish them that.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm confused why is this historic I'm positive this has happened before. Why would the sexual orientation have anything to do with whether or not IVF would work.

    I don't get it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    The article isn't about a scientific advancement, but a discussion of the limits on human rights in South Korea. "While South Korea has not yet legalised same-sex marriage, and sperm banks in the country are only accessible to heterosexual married couples, the pair were able to tie the knot in New York in 2019, and receive IVF treatment in Europe."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago
    [–] 3 points 2 years ago
    [+] 1 point 2 years ago
    [+] -10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I'm all for IVF but it should be second to adoption.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Shouldn't it be up to the parents?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Who said it isn't? But maybe, for the benefit of society as a whole, we should look at housing the ones we have before making more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    South Korea has one of the lower natality rates of the world, having more kids benefits them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Cool, I just hope that coincides with the highest rates of adoption in the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not everyone's capable of loving other people's kids but they can still be great parents to their own. Why not let them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not everyone's capable of loving other people's kids

    Sounds like a them-problem then

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Such a them problem is not a reason not to let them reproduce.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I wasn't aware that being infertile meant that society can do what it wants with you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Better idea: raise all children in a creche until they're 10, then have couples draft them like a fantasy football team.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    I want to moneyball that bitch. Get twenty kids whose expected value is higher than their sale value. While you yuppies will be bankrupt buying one genius kid I will have twenty smart kids for the same price turning out code and content.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Tell that to a hetero couple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Do you say the same thing to couples conceiving naturally; that natural conception should be second to adoption?

    Because if you don't, you would be the one discriminating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    When was the last time you told that to a hetero couple?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    In my original comment. Because I don't discriminate you'll notice that I didn't specify who should choose adoption, that means everyone should. I get that are you just being disingenuous because you've never seen someone with conviction of morals before, but please, try to catch up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Your original comment wasn't to a hetero couple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments