▲ 261 ▼ South Korea: Lesbian couple welcomes child via IVF in historic first (www.thepinknews.com) submitted 2 years ago by alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to c/world@lemmy.world 31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Not everyone's capable of loving other people's kids but they can still be great parents to their own. Why not let them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] duviobaz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not everyone's capable of loving other people's kids Sounds like a them-problem then permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] angrystego@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Such a them problem is not a reason not to let them reproduce. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No one said it was. Learn nuance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago So what do you think they meant by the the them-problem? What point were they trying to make? Do you think the comment was in favour of helping people with biological reproduction even though their not interested in adoption? Please, help me learn nuance. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] duviobaz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not everyone's capable of loving other people's kids Sounds like a them-problem then permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] angrystego@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Such a them problem is not a reason not to let them reproduce. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No one said it was. Learn nuance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago So what do you think they meant by the the them-problem? What point were they trying to make? Do you think the comment was in favour of helping people with biological reproduction even though their not interested in adoption? Please, help me learn nuance. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Such a them problem is not a reason not to let them reproduce. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No one said it was. Learn nuance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago So what do you think they meant by the the them-problem? What point were they trying to make? Do you think the comment was in favour of helping people with biological reproduction even though their not interested in adoption? Please, help me learn nuance. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No one said it was. Learn nuance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago So what do you think they meant by the the them-problem? What point were they trying to make? Do you think the comment was in favour of helping people with biological reproduction even though their not interested in adoption? Please, help me learn nuance. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago So what do you think they meant by the the them-problem? What point were they trying to make? Do you think the comment was in favour of helping people with biological reproduction even though their not interested in adoption? Please, help me learn nuance. permalink fedilink source parent