top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 3 years ago (1 child)

We had one of those TVs when I was a kid... and our dog had one of those metal link collars, and when she would shake her head the TV would change channels, and the volume would change. :). I had forgotten all about that.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Yep, my neighborhood friend had one. I discovered that my keys, when shook, would hit the frequencies to do stuff too. His dad was annoyed by it and I don’t know if he figured out how his TV would spontaneously change to channels

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    My grandmother had one of these.

    I somehow discovered that if I took this magnetic screwdriver, and this bent piece of coat hanger and slapped them together, her tv would turn off.

    I fucked with her so much she took her tv to a repair shop because she thought it was broken.

    Good times.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    God I love learning about analog tech! Very creative design!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago*

    Funny, when I was a little kid my grandmother had a Zenith TV with that exact remote. I still remember the long throw and clank of those buttons. TV remotes were uncommon then so I thought it was the coolest thing ever. Yeah dating myself here.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Would it have been possible for the speakers of the time to emit those frequencies? Imagining the equivalent of a Twitch raid: "I'm done broadcasting so I'm going to send you to the next channel."

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    We had a TV that used ultrasonic sound to control the TV, When I was young I could fairly hear the tone from a couple of the buttons, though super faintly, but the dog would cock its head when certain buttons were used.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It would have been possible, but it would have been expensive and required electricity to work. The fact that they accomplished their goal with what amounts to a set of tiny spring-powered mechanical bells is a marvel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    I meant it more in the sense of one channel, when shutting down for the night, emitting the "next channel" tone such that every viewer's set would change to a channel that was still broadcasting.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    My grandpa had a tv store around the time, and he always told the story of him pulling someone's leg by making them believe the tv was voice activated, with that thing in his pocket. So he covered the click sound by yelling at the tv.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    "Again, it required no batteries — much desired by Zenith, as the company didn’t want customers to think a TV was broken when the battery died."

    Was this really that big of a concern? Did people really think that LMAO

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Layer 8 issues occur all the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    Interesting purely mechanical design. Our first remote (that didn't have a cable connection) used sound as well, but it was battery powered and as a kid, I could hear at least some of those sounds. It had way more than just 4 buttons though, maybe the mechanical design hits a limit there at some point (or electronics just got cheaper).

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    If you’ve ever heard someone refer to a TV remote as a “clicker,”

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    I say this to my son sometimes. "Throw me the clicker." The first time he looked at me like WTF are you talking about. Told him it's another name for the remote, but didn't tell him why, so he still has no idea

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Modern design is boring and ugly as hell compared to what engineers and designers were able to come up with decades back.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Modern ‘design’ is all about pushing physicality and tactility out of the way, in an attempt to focus as much of your attention into your display as possible. As a result, everything aside from your screen has been ‘pushed aside’.

    I get it, I really do…but it’s all so depressingly sterile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    There's a great YouTube channel of this younger guy who teaches design and he makes very good videos that dissect a lot of the BS design trends. One of them is taking the old school "less is more" type of thinking into a stupid extreme. He explains that far too many designers are missing the deeper meaning in that design ethos which ends up making the user experience MORR complicated all so they could save adding an extra button to make navigating the device's interface infinitely easier.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    That sounds really interesting! I hope future product/UX designers see those kinds of videos and we can see a return of more ‘creative’ designs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Things run in cycles, so I'd like to think we'll get some sanity back in design, but designers work for companies, and companies like to make money, and no one makes more money than Apple. And Apple is downright obsessed with the bad version of "less is more". And of course the worst thing of all is that it is far easier to copy than to innovate, so these shit designs are here for a while.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    That looks like it was so satisfying to click.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    This is a really neat way to pull off remote technology. I wonder if there are still any applications for this type of ultrasound remote tech.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Quite ingenious and simple design, even considering the limitations of the time.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›