all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 44 points 2 years ago (1 child)

They've missed AirBNB and the likes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You might want to look up "Enshitification".

    No surprises here...

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It didn't suddenly go that way. It was always the plan. A loss leader.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    First new word I learned on lemmy a few months back.

    I think of it multiple times a day when browsing my RSS feed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Isn't that how silicon valley worked for years even within itself? Run a loss for long enough until you've overtaken the market and then raise prices when the competition has lost their edge.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    Turns out making everything into a subscription service doesn't make it better, it just makes it worse.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    Surprise we got scammed again.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    next up: ai is 100x more expensive than people

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Cloud was never supposed to be “cheap”. It has always been a utility based model where you pay for how much you use it. The problem is, way too many people used is as a 1:1 replacement without rearchitecting their workloads, so of course it’s gonna be more expensive.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not just that, but the big value proposition was supposed be that you wouldn't need sysadmins. In practice, these services are so complex that you need a dedicated skill set to use them, except now it's specific skills for each provider that aren't directly transferable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Uber was always more expensive then a taxi, at least in NYC/London. It was originally marketed as a "luxury" transportation option. The cloud was always ~2x more Operation Expenses with the value proposition that you didn't have any Capital Expenses so if you were a startup it was easier to sell-out and get started with lower risk. Streaming is still cheaper then cable, but it is getting shittier.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Streaming is still cheaper than cable

    That really depends on where you live. With my current provider here in the Netherlands, I would be paying 12.50 euros extra for TV.

    Netflix standard is already more expensive than that at 13.99.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago*

    A primary purpose of technology under capitalism is the violent control of people and the planet. Any actual progress is an unwanted side effect.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Wait till the CFOs start tallying up the GenAI bills...

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I poem you.

    Stremio, Torrentio, Realdebrid, Shieldtv.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I use Stremio which has tbs torrentio plugin. But what are the others?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Realdebrid serves torrents instantly from torrentio at 3 bucks a month. Nvidia shieldtv Pro is the best media steamer (*in my opinion which is probably worthless). I had Apple TV's running Stremio, but it was a pain in the butt syncing, so I gave those away.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I've been adding a bunch of torrent-focused features to both lemmy-ui and jerboa this week, the next releases of both should have them.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Is there a reasonable explanation for this or is it plain greed? In my book, technology gets always cheaper, but scalability is also always a concern.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's just greed. Companies exist to create profit for their shareholders, any social value they produce in the process is strictly incidental.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That's not "greed". It's capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sure, capitalism is a system that rewards greed and egoism ensuring that psychopaths rise to the top of the society.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Clowd was never cheap; it was versatile, and it still is.

    Just, please, get over this 'cheap' fallacy. It's expensive as shit, either in direct costs or the labour required to min-max for savings. If you're not regularly bulldozing a massive portion of your stuff or running in two regions for resilience, then you should just look at another idea -- and Don't say Azure, as there's a reason we call that cheap hot-garbage 'unsure'.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    thank you. came to the comments to say exactly this.

    cloud could be cheap, but it's a lot of work, or at least attention. people get disappointed with the costs, paradoxically, because cloud is easy and, as you put, versatile. and often between any two options allowing to do the same thing, the easier one will be more expensive.

    the biggest irony of the cloud is that many companies it seems, just like different species evolved into crabs, discover that all they need is a couple of own servers in a managed hosting environment, a CDN and outlook.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Indeed.

    Cloud is useful for things like flexibility - you need massive dynamic expansion/contraction of resources? Cloud can do it... But at a cost.

    Or for a startup - you need resources quickly, but don't want to invest in physical hardware because that's a risky investment if the business doesn't survive. But again, it's not cheap.

    Worst of all, each cloud provider has a convoluted system of features, by design, intended to lock you in to their system once you learn it. So you still have staff dedicated to that.

    The problem with cloud is much better explained here (I have no idea who this person is, just found their blog to be well written).

  • source
  • parent