As plausible as removing an image from the internet forever

As plausible as removing an image from the internet forever

The company's profit and loss sheets back that up—Tesla was spending heavily on GPUs from Nvidia rather than on new car lines, although that was followed by news that Musk has had many of those GPUs redirected to his social media company X.
So, let me get this straight... Tesla, a publicly owned company, of which Musk is an employee (and major shareholder) is buying GPUs to be used by Twitter/X, a privately held company of which Musk is the owner?
How is that not embezzlement?
The maze doesn't go anywhere and the red line circles back on itself
Symbolizes the rollout of large language models and the principal “garbage in, garbage out”.
It's also anything but the most efficient route for doing so. Like Abe Simpson toured the building before returning back to the hat stand and it the door.
Additionally, Musk announced a full self driving robot driver to make the robotaxis look more authentic

it'll be here in september december next may a year from now soon
Elon could have spun off Tesla’s AI (FSD) into a separate company or created a new AI company that Tesla uses for their FSD. Instead, he’s pivoting Tesla, a fairly successful, if troubled car company that uses AI, away from producing cars. Why? I mean, this is consistent with his firings and division layoffs, but it seems like a dumb decision from the board’s/investors point of view.
I saw a cyber truck in person for the first time this week. One thing I can say with certainty is that they are definitely NOT a truck company.
Elon says, we have another AI.
AI says, we have yet another "Elon says" post.
Great...the company known for running cars into EMS vehicles at 80mph is focusing on AI. This will turn out fine.
Sure, and the cyber truck can be used as a flotation device.
ITT: bionicjoey from lemmy.ca demonstrates the informal fallacy multiple ways
top 50 comments