Looks like a new model for the Fairphone has been announced! What do you think about it?

Personally I love the fairphone project but after having tried GrapheneOS on my Pixel 6a it would be hard to move to a different OS

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

JerryRigEverything already tested it and I'm impressed.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    As the owner of an FP4, I will not get any further FP products.

    The hardware is mostly fine, but it's also meh. The speaker sucks, the microphone sucks, the camera sucks. Just talking to people on the phone is a pain, since people just can't understand me.

    But worse is the software. Updates are slow (still no Android 13 on the FP4) and terribly buggy. Each update brings new bugs with it, old bugs are resolved only very slowly. One example of this is that some devices experience ghost touches. So in the newest update, they just lowered the sensitivity, so that the devices that didn't have ghost touches before now often don't register touch at all. On the forums there is a long list of known bugs. The weird thing here is that every user seems to get a random grab bag of bugs.

    And lastly: There is the price. It's so incredibly expensive, that it basically invalidates any benefit you get from the repairability. If I buy a comparable phone for ~€400 less, I can use that money to get the battery and screen professionally replaced a few times.

    So all in all, I am really not happy with the FP4, and this will most likely be my last Fairphone, unless Fairphone will finally migrate their software development to an in-house team where the devs actually use the phone themselves. Software QA is so terrible, that I can't imagine anyone at Fairphone actually using the phone themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    There definitely are bugs. But to be fair, for every phone I ever owned the forum looked the same: so many people complaining about so many different problems/bugs/hardware issues that you question why you even bought the phone in the first place. Most often the average user is perfectly fine but would never open up a forum post to announce this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The Fairphone is always just such an odd decision for me. On one hand, I would love to have a phone with long support and swappable parts. On the other hand, I hear so many complaints about the software and wait for major version updates that I am not enterily sure if it really is a good buy.

    The price is pretty okay, a bit less than 100€ per expected usable year. This is in line with other manufacturers. Also, the biggest bull of the expenses probably comes from the way the manufacturing and materials are checked.

    Is there any sense in installing a custom ROM on the phone to get rid of the software issues?

    Or maybe there will be less issues this time? From what I heard some of the problems where caused by Qualcomms support windows being closed and the company actually updating everything themself. Which might be solved by using a SoC with somewhat decent support now.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    the biggest bull of the expenses probably comes from the way the manufacturing and materials are checked.

    Could you expand on this? I am unfamiliar with Fairphone's methods for determining and checking sources for materials and manufacturing. Is it flawed?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    As far as I know, Fairphone uses "conflict free" materials. This is more expensive and harder to get than just searching for the cheapest seller of any material (e.g. lithium) and just going with them. In theory this should help against child or prison labor.

    Additionally, they aim to pay everyone in the chain a living wage. Which is also more expensive than just using foxxcon to produce as cheap as possible and telling them to "just add more suicide prevention nets".

    This is a good thing, but makes cost go up quite a bit I would assume. Additionally, the SoC is probably more expensive than the Snapdragon equivalent, as it is build "for industrial uses", which normally commands a premium.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Looks preety good, i think i'll have to swim to Europe to get one...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    No headphone jack. I really wish they'd bring that back.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    8 years support

    Wow. I wonder if they have a contract with Qualcomm for that.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    No, what they did was pick an SoC called QCM6490 which is used for embedded and industrial applications, and Qualcomm officially supports those for 8 years, unlike the snapdragon SoCs. According to gsmarena it should have performance similar to a snapdragon 778G.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago*

    Yeah, just read about it. That said Qualcomm's part of the support is said to be 5 years by Ron at Ars:

    Let's talk about that industry-leading 8–10 years of Android support, which doesn't necessarily mean 8–10 major OS updates. For now, Fairphone is promising "at least five operating system upgrades" because that is how long its weird Qualcomm chipset will officially be supported. Fairphone says Qualcomm will support that chip "until 2028" and after that, "Fairphone commits to extend support until 2031 and is aiming for 2033, giving users a total of eight to ten years of software support."

    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/08/fairphone-5-sets-a-new-standard-with-8-10-years-of-android-support/

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What's the deal with phones never having a 16:9 aspect ratio anymore?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (16 children)
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Would be nice if any of these new parts could be used in the older phones. Is that the case?

    After all the Fairphone 4 only came out less than 2 years ago.

    Would be better for Fairphone to focus on some kind of upgradeable platform which is better for the environment than keep making new phones. For now I'll stick to buying second hand phones whenever mine breaks.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't think this will ever happen, it's an anomaly unique to the PC market. The first time Fairphone did this with the FP3, allowing users to upgrade their camera, there was some minor OS workaround added to make this work, because the hardware in phones just isn't set up to handle this.

    IIRC I believe the workaround involved trying to get the installed camera to do something that the old one was not capable of doing, and if that operation failed it would spin up the driver for the upgraded camera. PCs use shared memory and a bunch of other standardised stuff I'm unfamiliar with to simply ask a device what it is, but phones can't do that for their internals (for the most part)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Smartphones technology progress is slowed down recently, but still, do you think that this phone will be usable in 8 years?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

    It won't be top of the line, but I don't really see why it wouldn't still be usable at least.
    And even if the person buying the phone today won't consider it usable for their needs in eight years time, they can still sell it to someone who doesn't have a need for a high spec'ed phone.

    I think you can look at it similarly to how one would look at an 8 year old laptop today.
    A decently spec'ed laptop from 2015 is still very usable today, as long as you keep your expectations reasonable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    No headphone jack? Wtf?! Pass!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    GSMarena reports displayport support in the USB.

    Can anyone confirm this? The site doesn't mention it and it's a game changing feature imo.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Kudos on Fairphone for offering 8 years of software updates.

    As an owner of FP4, my biggest gripes with the FP4 are the software updates. Bugs keep languishing for months before they are acknowledged and then months pass before the bugs are fixed. Three annoying issues with my FP4 that I deal with on a daily basis:

    • Screen dimming bug. First reported in Feb and the earliest possible fix is in October. My phone is useless when I'm out and about and the level of urgency implied by FP4 for this issue baffles me.
    • NFC stops working randomly
    • 5 GHz hotspot was broken for months and only fixed recently

    I don't care much about Android 13 as long as I get timely security patches. What I want is a bug free experience and that's something FP4 fails to deliver.

    An annoying hardware decision is the SIM card can't be hot swapped. Not sure why this wasn't addressed with FP5.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Isn't GrapheneOS supported on Fairphone as well?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί