Low power TV station takes advantage of the fact most TVs support H.264 and HEVC video codecs to broadcast 14 HD programs over the air.

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

It's funny that most people forget OTA TV still exists and that you don't need to pay to see a lot of shows. For the cost of one month's service fees you can get a decent amplified antenna, but if you're near any large cities that broadcast you can get a cheap cardboard-sandwiched antenna for less than $10 and requires no installation. It's cool to see some people are taking advantage of the open spectrum and newer technologies.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I've been running a Tivo OTA since 2017. Haven't paid for local channels since then. Paid once for the box and a good outdoor antenna. Now I only have Disney/Hulu bundle for free with my cell phone data package.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I've been OTA for 11 years. My last TiVo croaked on me last September.

    I cannot get a new one. They're not available... Anywhere! I even tried to bid on one on E-bay.

    WTF!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Sorry for the stupid thumbnail. It's not my video.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Lol, that's just how Antenna man has always done thumbnails. As a semi-regular viewer, I can say the interview with the small broadcaster really elevates this video above most of his other content. It's a pretty fantastic and informative video.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    This is interesting. I use OTA antenna tv everyday, almost exclusively. I almost forgot OTA HDTV still uses the mpeg2-ts, similar to the dvd codec. Newer tv hardwares (>2010-ish) all can decode mpeg4, theoretically, since they utilize internet streaming apps and services.
    I smell a new format war a comin'.
    I say, go right for mpeg4 h.265, or higher. Instead of mixing mpeg2 and mpeg4, like the video demonstrated. Because no way am i going to "buy" a DRM-protected thing for every broadcaster.... I'm currently pulling-in 20+ stations.

    And that may be the other format war... to pay or not to pay.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 3 points 2 years ago

    Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

    https://piped.video/e_94q9TCCDY?si=KuRxb6vsJ29EbAbw

    Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

    I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I am not really sure what ATSC3.0 brings that 1.0 doesn't have besides the codec features. I doubt it adds much on the bandwidth side.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    What I Think its adding is additional broadcast streams over the internet but integrated into the TV experience. This also means that all ATSC 3.0 TVs require a live internet connection, I think. So think the worst invasive monitoring and control of smart TVs forced on you just to watch broadcast television.

    I have zero interest in ATSC 3.0.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    What about the intrinsic quality of the broadcast programs? Shit stays shit even at 8k resolution

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments