top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 53 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The US government of yesteryear recognized a problem, so they drew up legislation intended to improve fuel efficiency, and thus reduce emissions. But they recognized that certain trades required large vehicles that could never be that efficient. So they built in a loophole for vehicles over a certain size not counting towards the requirements being placed manufacturers. Manufacturers being the crafty hogs they are realized if they just increased the size of everything they wouldn’t have to follow any of the rules. Now you have a company like Ford that only has one actual car ( a muscle car at that) in its lineup. Everything else are trucks suvs and crossovers.

The government of today could rewrite these rules to make the loophole require business licenses or something else, but half of them refuse to see there’s a problem at all, and half of what’s left are in the pocket of the problem makers.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    The Obama admin began changing CAFE to use a whole-fleet average which would have closed the large vehicle loophole.

    The Trump admin reversed that and pushed to eliminate CAFE altogether.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not to mention they’re tremendously dangerous for everyone who isn’t inside. The fear of dying in a car crash meets the illusion of safety, when it’s being forced to ride or drive in a car that puts your safety at risk to begin with.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is what happened with my family. We had a VW GTI and a Golf.. when the kiddo came along the wife wanted an SUV so if we got in an accident the kid wouldn't be automatically dead by one of these fucking monstrosities... I think I'm slowly convincing her that a car might be safe, but VW doesn't make the Golf for USA anymore..

    I feel like maybe a path forward would be a long the lines of what someone else has said. Make vehicle registration cost more depending on how big it is.. but who knows...

    Now to top it all off because of America's obsession with big vehicles there is still a limited selection of small hatchbacks in the EV zone...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    But what about my truck that is 65 tonnes of American Pride?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    God I get triggered by these monstrosities. Something tells me that's exactly why the people who buy them, buy them.

    Pass the pedestrian crossing extra slowly.

    Report any of them for any minor parking violation.

    Make them eat shit. If I could.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I parked behind one yesterday. Dude backed up into my car during my brunch. He comes into the restaurant to fess up. I tell him I'm the owner. He was nice enough. All he did was put a square dent in my license plate and bent it. I told him it's an old car and that it's ok. But as we were walking to my car he said "you parked close behind me and I couldn't see it as I backed up". I had half a mind to make a remark about having a clean, lifted, truck that probably hasn't hauled anything in 2 years, but I just shut up and let bygones be bygones.

    Still, I hope that guy realizes having a 9ft truck isn't worth the sweat every time he backs up. I have a Toyota Camry. Not the fanciest thing in the world. It's 20 years old and I do most of the work on it. So I'm not phased by a dent in the license plate (and possible minor trauma to the bumper). But it's the kind of car that a lot of people own. If he can't see that, he probably should consider lowering his lifted truck. Or perhaps learning to look behind his car before he hops in and tries to exit a parking space.

    People like that probably will never learn. They are buying an aesthetic, not a tool. It's like buying a high caliber pistol, an expensive phone, or a McMansion. It's not about having a tool. It's about having a sense of visible identity.

    Based on my long rant, I can tell I have not entirely "let bygones be bygones" despite shaking his hand and letting him drive away without a lick of shame.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    The other day a jeep wrangler swiped my car in a parking lot and drove off. I wasn't there but a kind bystander saw it and left their number and the offenders license plate. The damage wasn't small, but also small enough for me to shrug off because it's a 2014 golf wagon and in the end it's just a car.

    But the hit and run pissed me off enough that I reported it. The cops found the driver who will be ticketed now and their insurance will go up. If they fessed up I'd have let it slide.

    At least your dude fessed up. And yes, they'd all have a much easier time parking if they chose a sensible car.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    All my homies want a '95 Toyota Pickup instead of a '24 F-250.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago*

    The problem isn't only the cars, but the people who drive those cars also tend to not respect the rules.

    Bigger cars need to have more harsh road rules applied. Had a dodge ram 1500 go the wrong way around a round about as an example the other day and nearly hit me on my scooter.

    If I get hit by a hatchback, I'm fine (it has happened before). Dodge ram? I'm dead

    Simply requiring a truck licence and applying different rules would be enough

  • source
  • [+] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    One solution would be requiring special license for larger vehicles.

    A lot of people claim they need a car to get around. A normal license should allow you to drive just that - a sub 1 tonne vehicle.

    Now, if you fancy a large utility vehicle with lots of blind zones and taking up extra space - that's no problem, just get extra training to learn how to drive it safely and get reevaluated yearly to show that you are not a danger on the road. A lower threshold to losing or suspending your license would help too.

    This would dissuade a lot of people from upgrading to a large vehicles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    So a smart needs a special license, my mx5 too. My corsa i had beforehand also. So the European moped class am is what you want. Meaning the special license you want already exists and is called b, the typical car driving license.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Don't get too hung up on details. It doesn't need to be a weight class. Class b doesn't require regular re-examining, which i think would be the key in deterring people who don't need it and ensure they have the skills to operate the vehicle safely.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The US needs to revisit emissions laws. We need access to smaller trucks. Very VERY few people need a tank on public roads. I'd love to get something like an S10, early 2000's ranger, or an older Tacoma sized truck. My 13" F150 extended crew is the largest truck I feel comfortable owning.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    It does make me curious: has anyone seen a survey on how widespread that interest may be? Sure, it’s the practical answer, but i it an answer that a lot of people would give?

    Or how much price difference would it require? We naturally expect a smaller vehicle to cost less. The propaganda from one major manufacturer is that a small truck is still as complex and materials cost is small, so they could not produce a small truck for enough less that people would buy it. I know it’s corporate propaganda for sticking with their profit machines, but I suspect there may also be some truth in it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Meanwhile, people hate motorcycles even more

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Bullshit, more dangerous because of the other cars who are not used to having motorbikes nearby, and you have this idea of ​​being less protected on a motorbike, in reality you should try to understand that on a motorbike everything is much more predictable and the problem is almost only who is riding it, in a car, you have more blind spots and less control and therefore greater risk of making mistakes and for pollution, seriously, the simple use of a motorbike when all the space in the car is not needed would eliminate almost all traffic on the road therefore less pollution, less weight to move, less wasted energy, motorbikes are better in everything and not they are only considered because of the comfort zone of the average person.

    And noisy what the fuck means? even motorcyclists can be idiots and change the exhaust to make more noise, but this happens because having the fucking motorbike is a niche of people who adore and modify their motorbike, but you can very well not do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I think everyone knows someone who died on a motorcycle. I know of a few, none of which involved a crash with other vehicles.

    As for noise... All motorbikes are noisy. They have short exhausts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    I know someone who died because he was irresponsible, I myself had 2 accidents, one of which was serious and I no longer ride because I don't trust myself or others, with the problem that I spend a lot more if there is no public transport.

    It's a vehicle that gives too much freedom, and it doesn't take long for a person who isn't fully responsible to abuse what he can do on the road.

    I was speaking more ideally, because if you limit yourself you can have all the advantages it can give without ending up between the sheets of guardrails and cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›