Round 1: grilled

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 193 points 3 years ago (30 children)

Imo impossible meat is superior to beyond although nutritionally it’s a mixed bag. It introduces a decent amount of carbs (9g per 4oz) and has over 5x the sodium of beef. But it also has a bit of fiber and a either comparable or more vitamin/mineral content than beef. Protein is comparable to 80% ground with 20% less caloric content

Beyond is similar.

They’re both basically vegetable proteins with binders and fats and some flavorings. The big game changer flavoring is leghemoglobin which both use. It’s a protein isolated from soy that is very similar to certain enzymes from bovine muscle. Impossible got the fda to approve it in 2019 and it was challenged; there are some concerns on whether it is safe to eat. I’m not super well read on the issue but from what I’ve perused the issue is one of a lack of long term testing and not of any direct concern.

The textural difference between the two is because beyond uses isolated pea protein, which gives it a texture that’s a bit chunkier and imo more sausage like, and impossible uses soy protein, which imo is more like a cheap burger patty you’d get at McDonald’s.

The fats are typical fats like coconut oil or sunflower oil to recreate the fatty part of beef and this is the current weakness of the products imo. Coconut oil is used because it tends to stay solidified at room temp so when you’re making patties it feels like there are chunks of beef fat. In practice this is weird because they are far too hard and aren’t dispersed enough throughout the product; I believe this is why these fake meats tend to stick to the pan much easier than actual burgers cooked in a skillet.

The binders are big scary words like methylcellulose which is also a source of fiber and can be used as a laxative so people latch onto that and freak out. But it’s only used as a binder to help it hold everything together here so it’s like a tiny amount that just provides a bit of fiber that you probably desperately need if you’re having burgers for dinner. Fun fact: Certain preparations of methylcellulose (a4c) turn into gels when heated so you can use them to make hot ice cream! It’s pretty weird to eat, like a normal ice cream base that solidifies when you put it into boiling water

The other ingredients are stuff like beet juice for coloring

Final fun fact: technically impossible meat is not vegan because animal testing was done during its development.

Thanks for reading my unprompted essay on the composition of modern vegan meat substitutes. This was brought to you by my failed interest in becoming a food scientist. Also you may note I don’t really discuss how they compare to meat and that’s because I don’t eat meat which by law I am required to mention in all posts about food

  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    I do eat meat, quite frequently.

    Impossible is the only meat substitute I've had that I couldn't immediately tell the difference with, in either flavor or texture. If the price is ever on-par with hamburger (ideally cheaper), I will switch without hesitation. I will highly recommend it to anyone that's vegan (yes, yes, I know) or vegetarian.

    I've also had some soy wings that are very, very good, better than real wings. Then again, I don't actually like real chicken wings that much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The meat alternatives will only get better as time goes on and market demand grows. A burger or nugget is really not an impossible (lol) to recreate item; most of the meat texture is lost by the processing involved.

    A burger is obviously ground and a nugget is usually chicken that’s ground to almost a paste then shaped and breaded. At that point it’s finding something that can approximate the texture of the mushed up meat goo and then finding something that can convincingly flavor it. That’s why impossible was so adamant to get leghemoglobin cleared by the fda, it really is by far the best option. If not that your other options are basically trying to recreate a “meaty flavor” with spice blends and msg which is how the older meat alternatives worked

    The much bigger challenge is finding something that can texturally approximate intact muscle (eg wings or steak). As you’ve said there are decent soy wings and there are steak strip things and such but these are generally passable. They taste good and are fine as a meal but they aren’t the same in the way an impossible burger is reallllly close to a burger. Lots of people trying though! Jackfruit, tvp, seitan, pea and soy protein, etc. but none of them come close to the mouth feel and texture of a wing or steak. Someday, maybe. I hope someone figures it out; I haven’t had meat in like 20 years or so but I do miss the texture of steak from time to time and wish I had something that could recreate that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Seems like an absolute process. I'm not a vegan but it's nice you guys have options when you're craving a burger. I can't wait until that lab grown meat hits the markets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Honestly I think Beyond Meat/Impossible style burgers are aimed at meat eaters who want to reduce animal cruelty/their carbon footprint. It's actually kind of annoying they're so popular now, as restaurants that used to have creative vegan options now sell Beyond Meat as the only choice.

    Vegans don't tend to care if a veggie burger is "realistic". Some find the idea of meat gross and don't want to roleplay eating it (my wife says they make her feel sick). Even if you don't mind, the longer you give up meat the less interesting it is as a flavor. I'd take one of those shitty frozen veggie burgers that are 90% potato over an Impossible burger.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    has over 5x the sodium of beef

    I'm curious, I've never cooked with Impossible meat before, is the "meat" just already salted/seasoned well? When I make a burger I definitely add quite a bit of salt while cooking, wondering if that sodium is just it being pre-seasoned or if that's before a (needed) good pinch of salt

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago

    It’s probably from the yeast extract which is part of the heme

    To be clear tho it still doesn’t have all that much salt. It’s more that raw beef just barely has any. Both impossible meat and raw beef pale in comparison to the salt content of the final burger, where the sodium content skyrockets from things like ketchup, pickles, seasoning the patty during cooking, the salt content of the bun, etc

    And imo you should still salt/pepper an impossible patty after formation. As mentioned, while the salt content is higher, it’s still not terribly high, and imo it benefits from a bit more. In my experience it’s not like meat and you can salt whenever you want (whereas with beef you generally want to salt patties absolutely last minute to avoid giving the meat a lightly cured texture)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (26 replies)
    [–] 81 points 3 years ago (17 children)

    If there’s one dish where I feel it’s a waste to eat animal meat, it’s hamburgers. Vegetarian alternatives have come a long way and in a burger they’re often the superior option.

    There’s a small difference for sure, but the BM patties are far from inferior. And much of the difference is masked by condiments anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Nothing pisses me off more than seeing "wagyu beef burger" on a menu. What's the fucking point if you're gonna grind it up and shape it into a patty

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    They still use the burger parts for burger. They’re not taking a ribeye and grinding it up and selling it at a loss.

    Is it a dumb thing for dumb people? Maybe. You would think the extra fat would just cook off and it wouldn’t go very far vs uncooked weight.

    I wouldn’t buy one but I wouldn’t want that meat to go to waste either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (17 children)

    I personally think like the complete opposite - if there's anything that's a waste, it's a beyond meat burger, because veggie burgers are like, really fucking good. Why on earth would you settle for an inferior pretend product when you can instead have a really good thing that's not pretending to be something else?

    Miss me with that fake meat stuff and bring back actual veggie burgers! I got a real nice sweet potato and refried black bean one I've been working on for a while now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    100% agree. The imitation methods used in all of the vegan "meat" products just are not near good enough. My ex made me try a bunch, they varied from a little off to just plain gross. Even though I approached each one with an open mind, not a single one was enjoyable. It was actually really hard to keep an open mind after a while, having been either disappointed or disgusted 100% of the time in the past.

    However, chickpea patties? Delicious. Black bean burgers? They're usually pretty decent too. There was one veggie burger we tried that had portobello mushrooms as the main ingredient, and it was the most delicious veggie burger I've ever had, hands down. It was so savory and juicy, and the texture was excellent.

    I just wish these companies would just focus on plant based products with great taste as their main goal rather than trying to imitate meat, because they're just so astonishingly terrible at it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (16 replies)
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 61 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Lemmy has a different ides of what counts as food porn.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 42 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I feel like a lot of you never had a good hamburger in your life

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 36 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    I'm gonna need an explanation of your bun situation. From here that looks like you're using extra wide english muffins or something.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 32 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    I really enjoy BM's burger personally. Taste is good but the real kicker is the texture and how it really has some body to it. What's the consensus on them?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    I personally think the flavour is off but the texture is good, I personally prefer impossible burger

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 29 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Both of these look pretty mediocre. wtf are you doing with the cheese? lmao

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 26 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I can't wait for lab-grown meat.

    "From lab to slab!"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago

    They both look terrible tbh

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    I'm not sure how I am supposed to judge food based on pictures. It could look like dwarf barf, if it tastes and feel good it's ok.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago*

    I can't even tell which is which. Based on the beef patties I had last night, the right is the meat. But the left could be meat too - but cooked by a heathen on a very very low grill. But as you say, who cares if it tastes great? I don't even need Beyond meat to taste like meat if it tastes delicious.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Had Beyond a few times, it's really impressive. I'm not a vegetarian (sorry) but rather a meat reducer. Keep making stuff like this available and I and many people like me will have no more excuses.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm a fan of Beyond meat but this doesn't qualify as food porn. They look ok I guess but definitely not porn level.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    We should make a “just alright food” community

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 14 points 3 years ago (5 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 11 points 3 years ago

    You seem to have accidently put the cheese on the bottom.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I prefer the Impossible beef. I just think it tastes better.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›