In an online discussion post, Alcorn State University history professor Dr. Jason Gibson posed a question that represented part of his students' midterm. It was about the...

all 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 51 points 1 hour ago (4 children)

This is hysterical. Like the cheaters couldn't even be bothered to proof read what the AI wrote to make sure it was correct.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 hour ago

    You haven't ran into someone doing this on work emails?

    They don't read the full email they get, just far enough to see if they got what they want. Then they plug it into an AI, and tell it to respond, then copy/paste it back to Outlook and hit reply.

    They'll keep doing that, over and over. And it usually ends up with them insisting on a meeting to "discuss" where they essentially get in a loop of "it'll work, just do it"

    And it's like pulling fucking teeth to get them to admit the only thing they're basing that on, is a chatbot told them it would work.

    People are worried about the kids, and we should be, but it rotted adults brains even faster, and because of their age they've got a much shorter clock to stop using it before effects are permanent. Couple with Covid related IQ drops and the fact that time is linear and we'll keep getting older...

    Society is fucked.

    We need to seriously treat AI like an addictive drug that people aren't capable of limiting themselves with.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 36 minutes ago

    Most people who use AI to write something can't be bothered to make sure it is correct. It pisses me off at work so bad when someone "writes" a document or does "research" with AI and just copy pastes it into an email without actually reading to see if it makes sense.

    I got so pissed of a couple months ago when people were telling me about a "great research document" that someone put together for something we had coming up that we desperately needed information about. As soon as they shared the document to me I realized it was completely AI generated and 1/3 of it didn't make a lick of sense. I wanted to yell at the person who created it to at least take 10 minutes to delete all of the obviously incorrect crap.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -9 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

    That happens with classes like history or philosophy, the ones that are considered to be mostly useless blablabla.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    Those being treated as useless (goes back to No Child) is the fucking problems

    Humans are not innately moral, someone needs to teach them that shit, that's what history and philosophy is for

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 hour ago

    They are useless. History is useless by definition; and philosophy has reached the peak of its usefulness somewhere in the middle of the XIX century and can't do better anymore. Like alchemy, which was useful at some point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 54 points 1 hour ago*

    Here saved you a click and and badly written "article"

    In an online discussion post, Alcorn State University history professor Dr. Jason Gibson posed a question that represented part of his students' midterm. It was about the Industrial Revolution, but knowing how many students now rely solely on artificial intelligence for their answers, he secretly embedded instructions telling the AI to include information about Madagascar in a way that makes no sense.

    Being written in white text meant the instructions were invisible.

    (...)

    Had any of these cheaters even bothered to check what the AI had generated, they'd likely have noticed the strange references to the island country constantly appearing in an essay about the Industrial Revolution.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 49 minutes ago (3 children)

    Sure enough, 32 out of the 35 students across two classes simply copied the question, pasted it into a chatbot, then copy and pasted its output into the answer window.

    That's an insanely high proportion. I don't think I've ever cheated on an exam or assignment, so the concept seems kind of weird to me.

    I wonder if some of the remaining people used AI but then reviewed the output and removed the weird stuff, or if they wrote it themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 25 minutes ago (1 child)

    What don't get is how they didn't see the "invisible" text when they were copying it to paste it into the AI. Any tool I've ever used to select and copy text highlights it in a way that would show the "invisible" part. Was the question just so long that they could easily miss it?

    I love the story but I'm a little skeptical just because of this one detail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 38 minutes ago

    I went to college in 90 and its kinda a wierd time as not to long before people would ask if you where going to college but by that time it was where you were going to college. So it was just as going to college was sorta expected. I too am blown away by that number of students but I think im thinking more of my major area where people genuinely (I think) were mostly motivated to learn about it and do it as a career. Myself I really did like the liberal arts education so was by and large equally avid in non majors classes. Thing is since then college has just become more and more this forgone conclusion and the pressure to be in a major that results in a career that pays over what one is interested in, I think is much higher. So I guess im not surprised. We really need people to be able to work and make enough to have a family on a single income without going to college (heck you can't even do that going to college now) or this stuff is just going to get worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 hour ago

    "Madagascar floats sideways through the afternoon."

    That’s the most aesthetic I’ve ever seen captured in a sentence.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 16 minutes ago

    Like, come on. Screen shot and put it in to an OCR if you're just too lazy to write out the prompt again.

    (Or idk do the work you're paying exorbitant tuition for)

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 52 minutes ago (1 child)

    If I were a professor in this day and age, every exam would have an oral component. If it's a class that has a large group of people, then I'd have my TA's run oral exams with small groups separately.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 18 minutes ago

    Oral isn't necessary and can overwhelm even very smart and knowledgeable students.

    Just require all work is turned in handwritten. Tests are also done handwritten.

    That's it. It's impossible to not absorb the stupidity of AI if you at least have to handwrite the answer.

    It's impossible to copy/paste an answer into a test if it's handwritten.

    The only thing stopping this is that teachers are used to the convenience of computer submitted work, remote learning, and disability workarounds.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 29 minutes ago

    Unfortunately, Alcorn State University didn’t publish the offending student’s names, and didn’t expel them, forever tarnishing all Alcorn degrees.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 41 minutes ago (1 child)

    It didn't catch students who used AI. It caught students who didn't proof read their work after AI drafted it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 36 minutes ago

    At least using AI but proofreading and fixing AI's mistakes uses your human brain to some degree. If they must use AI I'd rather they be smart enough to comprehend what it puts out and do at least some critical thinking of their own.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 53 minutes ago*

    This isn't fair. Madagascar is 592,800 square kilometres. You shouldn't discriminate against prompt engineers in their studies before they've even had a chance to take those future-skills into the workforce. In 2024, Madagascar was estimated to have 32m residents. The professor should be ashamed.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 30 minutes ago

    I watched the source videos and in the second the prof says of the two people who contested the cheating charge, one managed to get her grade changed by claiming she used dark mode so saw the "hidden" white text. Smart argument, I wonder if he actually believed it.

  • source