all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 55 points 3 days ago (1 child)

This shouldn't even be up for debate.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    They could solve this problem and a bunch of others by banning the surveillance and collection of user data without consent.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Can't help but imagine this would result in having to "read" and sign a 70 page ToS and 30 page Privacy Policy before we can buy groceries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 3 days ago* (1 child)

    sounds like a job for foss AI. I'm sure a ToS specific model running on a CPU would be more than enough. I think that's what Pegasus does and I'm sure there are more. copy and paste, get a ELI5, then decide.

    edit: I bet someone could flimflam it into a browser extension.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago

    This is the way.

    Terrifying that it takes state intervention to do this most basic of things. Fuck this timeline.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago

    The fact they're trying is still a problem.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    More perfect union did a few stories about this. Beware the bill that looks like it helps but secretly opens the door to doing the same thing. Basically, don't believe what you see until someone you trust says it will actually help.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago

    Don't trust it until lawyers have had months to examine the exact wording. Loopholes are to easy to hide. Often a other wise good bill will have something awful in it such that you must oppose the whole

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    I would die for my country, New Jersey

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    Yet another common NJ W.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (2 children)

    For those not in NJ trying to avoid this, pay in cash and punch in a random phone number at the register.

    You may need to try a few numbers at self-checkout to find a working one, but it's surprisingly easy. Rotate the numbers to dirty up the data of these parasites.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    er what? Are you saying people in US have to enter their phone number every time they buy stuff??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    "loyalty cards" are common. stores (and each of their 369354764 data sharing "partners") get to track everything you buy and when. in exchange, you get token "discounts" on a small selection of products. some stores have done away with the actual physical cards, and use mobile phone apps or just the mobile phone number to track you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments