Edit: For context, @db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com discovered that the developer of Tesseract had discretely banned numerous instances and disguised it as a server error. This included more heavily leftist instances, but also blahaj.zone. More recently, it was discovered that they had also been suppressing individual users, phrases, and communities that criticize power tripping on fedi.

Needless to say, I implore non blahaj.zone users to drop the Tesseract client (support for the client has already been dropped for blahaj). So called "liberals" like this who call out "extremism on both sides" are an insult to the values they claim to be upholding.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 1 day ago*

the dev of Voyager has the option to do the funniest thing ever next April fools

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    First I was like "oh, guess I'm not active enough to be noticed", but there's people on the list who barely posted anything.

    Guess I just didn't manage to say something that would have annoyed this person. Like talking about burger units and shit. 🤷🏻‍♀️ I'm just a weird anarchy hippie nerd trans girl, don't ban me. Oh crap I said it out loud

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    I made the top 20! This is where I'll take a bow and go to bed. Goodnight, friends.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    I'm not there. My game is faltering.

  • source
  • [–] 118 points 3 days ago (5 children)
  • [–] 24 points 3 days ago (6 children)

    Let me see if I get it.

    Someone maakes a Lemmy client, which function is just to interact with fediverse side if lemmy, then the developers just silently blocks everything they don't like, probably because it's too woke or something like that.

    Why even development a client to begin with??

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)

    Should have been aggressive enough that the shitlibs are scared of you instead of holding you in the patronizing contempt they reserve for the disenfranchised.

  • source
  • [–] 117 points 4 days ago (9 children)

    So real. Need to start complaining about paywalled articles more.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 16 points 3 days ago

    Going to take the fact I'm not in the list as proof that I'm not hornyposting enough and could go further

  • source
  • [–] 72 points 3 days ago

    Me, seeing my name on this list:

  • source
  • I was in the OG blocklist as "garden-variety crackpot" https://github.com/paulo-roger/tesseract/blob/2b53f17a5506b7c4b3ad1d5c26af49662f03a478/src/lib/blacklists.ts#L2711-L2725 blobhaj, sunglasses. Although I'd like to object to the "garden-variety" part, my crackpottery is artisanal.

  • source
  • [–] 76 points 3 days ago (17 children)

    Don't forget this also works in reverse! The blocklist is also a contact list of cool people ;)

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • load more comments (17 replies)
    [–] 24 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    The actual adminowner of my instance took time out of their very very busy day to present me personally with a medal for my inclusion. I shall wear it with Pride

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 2 days ago (6 children)

    I’m a normie how do I search the blacklist for my username?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)

    The blocklist is so wild. It really appears to be someone who has put a lot of work into removing any exposure to anyone who cares about literally anything. What a sad little piece of shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • load more comments (26 replies)
    [–] 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    I'm honored to be on it, and surprised you aren't

  • source
  • [–] 84 points 4 days ago (26 children)

    Kinda sad I didn't make their shadowban list.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • load more comments (26 replies)
    [–] 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

    Oh no my queer as hell ass is not on the list. Perchance I have not been doing enough ACAB

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    Why are people like this? This person once helped me out (kinda) for a comment rendering thing for my own client (I was unfamiliar with nested comments and how they worked with the API). It's so sad and frustrating to see people you had non zero respect for do something so shitty like this. Like... especially for a group of people SO FUCKING CORNERED ACROSS THE WORLD. What's the thought process behind this? So so shitty.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

    The funny thing, with all regex / wordlist bans, is that it will catch waay more than it is intended to. The old Scunthorpe problem. I wonder how it must feel to browse this with random words triggering the filter.

    From a quick glance, this guy does not like politics, NSFW stuff, making fun of mod abuse, anime, internet speech / "reddit-isms"... this must be a very empty place then

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 43 points 3 days ago

    Nice! I'm on it, too!

    Now, how do I trigger a GDPR and force them to remove my name, just to annoy the dev?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Good news, they namedropped you in their explanation comment:

    Both Ada and CupcakeZealot (Jessica I think?) continuously look the other way when any blahaj users call for violence. Admins can see when reports are resolved, by whom, and can check the actions in the modlog. I do not tolerate advocacy of violence in any shape or form and refuse to allow my project to be used by people who endorse that kind of behavior. Most instances at least deal with it on a superficial level, but Blahaj refuses to. This indicates, at minimum, tacit endorsement.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›