[–] 1 point 5 hours ago

How? Are you suggesting that people will now show criminal evidence online just to prove that they got a cease and desist? That would be beyond stupid, and I don't think there's anything in the article that suggests it. There are other ways to prove it, such as asking Flock's legal team (if they say they did, it's because they did), or verifying if the letter has a consistent format and return address with other cease and desist letters that the legal team sent.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    If I were you, I'd tape the glasses in the places where the cameras and microphones would be if they were Meta glasses. That way, people who look at the glasses would think that even if you actually had cameras and microphones in your glasses, you taped them. I'm not sure if this would work, but I think it's worth a try...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

    Wait, I just learned that the original Tesseract dev, paulo-roger, left the project many years ago. Here's the reason he gave:

    I'm tired of dealing with the arrogant, tone-deaf Lemmy developers and their utter disdain for moderators and anyone else working within the ecosystem. To that end, development of and support for Tesseract for Lemmy has ceased.

    Hmm, I wonder who paulo-roger was talking about 💀💀
    (I've mistook who paulo-roger was talking about... Thanks, TotallynotJessica!)

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    True. However, there are still many ways to do it. If anyone reading this is curious, here are a few ways:

    • Find a way to run Linux commands in Windows (WSL, VirtualBox, ...);
    • Rewrite the command for PowerShell;
    • Do it manually (visit https://tesseract.dubvee.org/tesseract/api/system/policy, either right click and do "Save As..." or copy all the text, use an online Base64 file decoder, use a tool like 7-Zip to extract the GZip, and change the extension to txt so you can read the file with Notepad).
  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    Oh, and if you want to get banned, you must:

    • Go to the comms the dev does;
    • Say something they might consider "too extremist" (either to the left or to the right, from what I gathered) or "too group thinking".

    I don't see much benefit in doing this, but have fun.

    EDIT: I forgot to say that you should also avoid any of the keywords in the blacklist, otherwise your post/comment might not show up at all in the dev's feed.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    I believe the dev isn't actively looking for things to ban. They probably just ban things whenever they find them at their feed. TotallyNotJessica admits she doesn't post much outside of blåhaj zone, so it's not unlikely that she never appeared on their feed.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 11 points 3 days ago* (5 children)

    Don't worry, TotallyNotJessica. It's possible you don't interact in the same communities the dev does, and I think that's the reason you aren't in the blacklist.

    (Removed unnecessary P.S. comment)

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    For the nerds, another post (the one OP links to) stated that you can check the list by yourselves from the source by running the following command in the terminal:

    curl -s https://tesseract.dubvee.org/tesseract/api/system/policy policy \
    | base64 -d | gunzip > policy.json
    

    (Reminder to NOT RUN any commands on your terminal you don't understand)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Sorry for writing all of this in one go, but I felt like this was so urgent I needed to say all of this before I go to bed (it is late where I live). So, in true surrealist fashion, here goes my stream of conciousness.

    I'm pretty much talking about this post where mods of another Lemmy community say that jawa21 is asking for money because she doesn't have enough money to pay for her fine. If this sounds fishy, here's another mod of that community explaining a few more details.

    If you don't have time to read that, here's the TLDR: jawa21 has been arrested and forced to pay a fine for arsoning (nobody knows if she actually did it, but that's not the point). She already did her jail time, but she doesn't have enough money to pay the 1k$ fine (she says she just has 40$ right now), so she will face even more jail time if no one helps her through this. She lives in the US, and as most of us already know, the prisional system has been a shitshow, specially now that they aren't even respecting people's genders. The reason why this is so urgent is because she has until tomorrow to pay or else jail!

    Thought I might have shared this with you guys and gals, as she has recently posted some comics in here. If you wanna donate, the link is https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jawa21 . That is all I have to say. Have a nice day.

     

    Eu hoje vi um episódio em que havia uma senhora com margem de 1500€ que apostou uns 800€ acima do preço verdadeiro da montra final, mas perdeu à mesma. Eu fiquei confuso: não deveria a senhora ter ganho se a margem dada pelo programa é claramente superior à margem de erro da sua aposta? Será que a margem do Preço Certo não funciona da maneira que eu penso que funciona?

    view more: next ›