top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 107 points 4 days ago (3 children)
  • [–] 76 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    Thank you!

    When inquired about the reason for the prosocial gesture, most of the responses in the two conditions referred to the importance of recognizing pregnancy, with some directly referring to social norms, education, or safety (see Table 1).

    Interestingly, among those who left their spot in the experimental condition, nobody directly associated their gesture with the presence of Batman, and 14 (43.75%) reported that they did not see Batman at all.

    Interestingly, while the data suggest that this perturbation may have a strong effect, a notable percentage of individuals were not consciously aware of the reason behind it. Given that attention is socially influenced (e.g., the phenomenon where people instinctively look toward the same point of interest as those around them), we can hypothesize that the pattern of awareness triggered by a disruption in routine may be socially transmitted, extending beyond its original cause. This may also help account for the subset of participants who reported not noticing Batman but nevertheless offered their seat. A speculative interpretation is that the disruptive effect can operate at an interpersonal level: shifts in attention or prosocial cues triggered in some individuals may spread socially within the group, influencing behavior even among those not directly aware of the initial disruption, consistently with research on the social contagion and interpersonal synchrony of prosocial and emotional behaviors14.

    This was a really interesting read!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    The potential applications for this research are worth a mention, too:

    These findings contribute to discussions on how public spaces and social interventions can be designed to encourage kindness and cooperation. If unexpected yet non-threatening events can increase mindfulness and prosocial behavior, urban planners, policymakers, and psychologists may consider ways to integrate “positive disruptions” into daily life. This could range from artistic or theatrical interventions in public spaces to strategic messaging campaigns designed to momentarily break routine and engage individuals more deeply with their environment and community.

    It sounds like more public art can lead to more pro-social behavior, especially if the art is changed periodically (to keep it "unexpected.") There's a lot to be explored with this idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 days ago

    I read somewhere that being or feeling watched makes people behave better, so just pictures of people will have an effect.

    Makes sense. They see what looks like a person, the brain eagerly looks up "how do I act when there's someone here?", then realizes it's just a painting, but the good behavior is already looked up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago

    It also stands to reason that more people are likely to notice the pregnant woman when their attention is drawn to a nearby Batman, whether that attention is direct or drawn by other people looking at Batman.

    More people noticing the pregnant woman increases the chance that one of them will offer their seat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 73 points 4 days ago

    The patriarchy don't respect the matriarchy unless in the presence of the batriarchy. Got it.

  • source
  • [–] 56 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 child)

    isnt it just thay you're more likely to notice someone dressed up, and the people around them whilst staring at your phone, instead of never looking up because the pregnant woman has normal trousers

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    What an interesting potential explanation! Guess you'll have to go out and test to find out. You could also choose less bombastic moral characters to test if the moral judgement angle is also true (like a priest with his tab removed)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 37 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Was it because of morality associated with a superhero? Batman specifically? Or was it just because normally people mind their own business and avoid looking around and qualifying one another until an unmissable weirdo is in their presence and they keep looking and only then notice the pregnant woman?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    No, they are batman haters and don't want batman to get the seat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Batman takes the metro after a long night fighting crime. His feet hurt. He just wants to sit for a few minutes. Why is no one offering Batman a seat?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    What if some crazy shit breaks out? Can't have Batman all relaxed and unprepared.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago (6 children)

    Dude, I want you well rested and ready to fight at a moment's notice. You get a whole bench if you want it. Hell, I'd even listen^1^ if you just need to vent; Joker has got be fucking exhausting to deal with.


    1. It's no superpower, but it's what I can do.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 53 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Probably because people are often too distracted, something that takes attention like someone wearing a Batman costume, would bring people attention to their surroundings

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 4 days ago

    passangers looked up because they noticed the guy in the weird costume and then realized the pregnant woman which otherwise wouldn't have.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    A while ago, I also heard of a study, where they had kids do a task until the kids would give up. And when they let the kids dress up as their favorite superhero, the kids would persevere much longer.

    Obviously, the kids being in a better mood can be a factor, but if I remember correctly, it was also a conclusion that the kids persevered, because they thought the superhero would persevere in this situation.
    You can probably tell quite well, when their mood falls off a cliff, but they still push on, so could certainly see that being a conclusion...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 11 points 4 days ago

    Was it because they were dressed as Batman or because everyone assumed it was being videoed and didnt want to be recorded and uploaded as a stupid prank.

    When people think they are being watched and recorded, they are more likely to polite. Dont need someone dressed as a superhero to do that part.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    I actually had to look for this to see if it's true, it was, but for some reason the article blurred their faces

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Wonder what specifically about Batman causes that? Would the same thing happen with Superman? Wonder Woman? Punisher? Would it happen with a child dressed as Batman?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 days ago

    they should have used Robin as a control. This is the problem with psychology studies calling themselves science. Maybe people are so self involved on their phones they didn't see the preggo but Batman distracted them.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 4 days ago

    they were all just trying to get away from the wierdo dressed as batman

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    The number of people actually asking questions in here on Lemmy makes me happy. If I could, I'd give all of y'all each a cookie.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago

    Pregnancy bumps are lower...

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Just gotta say thats an extremely unconvincing pregnant woman

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    The effect, for listeners who might not know, refers to the children's character "the Bat-Man" a strong gentleman who fights crime nocturnally

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

    "sorry, I would give you my seat, but Batman's here and I want to skew the data"

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    Were they also testing people's reactions to triplets?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    It's a shame they only tested with Batman. I think there was a study about how people behaved more honestly in the presence of authority figures (even if just a photo of police is displayed).

    I'd like to see the results if they dressed like Spongebob

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

    Let me get this straight, you think that your fellow traveller, one of the wealthiest and most powerful men in the world, is openly a vigilante, who spends his nights beating criminals to a pulp with his bare hands, and your plan is to refuse offering a seat? Good luck.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›