all 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 139 points 6 days ago (1 child)
[–] 83 points 6 days ago (2 children)

“public domain” sounds naughty, too, though

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    The next time my best friend calls me a slut (fairly common occurrence), I'll be informing him that I am Public Domain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 6 days ago

    If not free use, why all the holes?

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    Stop shaming the rest of us for not knowing your kinks.

    Let us be vanilla as fuck in peace.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    To know enough about copyright to be concerned about it using a character IP in your works but to know so little about it as to think maybe SpongeBob has entered the public domain by now is a very very narrow subsection of people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    1999, it's been around for longer than a lot of people's lives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 child)

    Don't say 1999 like that is ancient. Also, there's only like 30 people that were alive when most things finally entering the public domain came out. If anyone over the age of 7 thinks that Steamboat Willie and SpongeBob are remotely comparable in age, they have no sense at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 days ago

    It's still a silly question because who would even think SpongeBob would be close to public domain anyway. It's the lifetime of the creator plus 70 years. Were no where close to this ever happening and the only stuff we are even seeing now are crazy old.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 6 days ago

    I mean it only sounds nasty if you’re a fucking degen. But with that many holes, it’s still a question worth asking.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 6 days ago (3 children)

    What is misleading about this. Someone spell it out for me.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 6 days ago

    anyways, freeuse is kinda what it says on the tin. "Free" to "use" the person wherever, whenever. if they're relaxig in bed, while they are doing the dishes, outside gardening the plants,, while asleep. Usually has some overlap with the ignoring kink where they try to just go about their day and pretend they aren't being railed ruthlessly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    Free use is a kink. And "old enough" is like they are asking whether they can expand rule 34.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago (1 child)
  • [–] 23 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    Neither are the 500 year old dragons that look like human children. And yet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago

    That would make weird for the 500 year old dragons that look like children. They're clearly violating the "half your age plus seven" rule, when they're having sex with 45 year old overweight and balding Japanese businessmen in all those hentai manga.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago (2 children)

    Right, and therefore those aren't and could never be free-use lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago* (1 child)

    And yet the dragons are free-use in every fanfiction I've ever written? And they love it, by the way. I write mostly Star Trek stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    Do you usually have to clarify that you're not talking about copyright law? lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 days ago

    Nubile twink opens all his holes

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 days ago

    Is SpongeBob freeuse? Link him the MeatCanyon video. You know the one.

  • source
  • Reminder that Steamboat Willie (1928) was scheduled to enter public domain in 1986 (or 1955 if not renewed)

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    AI slop. Look at the names

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago* (1 child)

    ugh fuck

    this exchange is so funny. i wanted to repost it to my mastodon instance. but i'm not reposting fucking AI slop. we have rules against that

    what the fuck was even the point of bothering to mangle this image in that way? how is feeding it through an LLM somehow EASIER than drawing black squares in MS paint? it didn't need censored in the first place! who the fuck cares!!!

    fuck! i fucking hate this shit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 days ago

    He's got enough holes for everyone

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago*

    Is it misleading though? He didn't say what kind of movie it was going to be.

  • source